But supposing the circumstance of great multitudes of them appearing
just at one particular period of the year, to be a fact, a new light
is thrown upon their origin which must then be considered as decidedly
of an astronomical character. The theory which has been proposed,
is this:--that immense quantities of fragments of matter revolve in
regular orbits in our solar system in various planes, and that on
the 13th of November the earth passes near the orbit in which the
greatest number of such fragments move. Whether they are matter in a
gaseous state, or approaching it, or quite solid; or whether they are
constantly illuminated, or are only rendered luminous by their relation
to other bodies, such as reflection, or meeting with electric fluid,
and so becoming ignited, are questions which must remain unanswered.
There may be a slight evidence in favour of the notion of their
light not being permanent in themselves, from the fact of a French
naturalist having observed on the 17th of June in 1777, a very large
number of small black spots pass over the sun's disc. If these spots
were really bodies, which under other circumstances would have been
falling stars, it should not be forgotten that the earth in June is
nearly in the opposite part of its orbit to that which it passes over
in November.
Well, after all, this is a very doubtful subject, and we may possibly
be very much out in our notions; but it is always worth while to see
which is the best of two theories, though there may be ever so little
to choose between them. We should make the best of what knowledge we
have, and never lazily satisfy ourselves by saying--"nobody can tell
which is true," which is almost as bad as being too obstinate and
dogmatical. For even if we adopt a conclusion which is wrong, we shall
be more ready to receive the truth when our knowledge may be increased,
than if we have no conclusion at all. One of the wisest men who ever
lived, said--"Truth comes more easily out of positive error than out of
confusion."
You who have been interested with what I have told you respecting
shooting stars, should compare with it what I shall tell you in my next
chapter.
[Illustration]
CHAPTER V.
METEORIC STONES OR AEROLITES.
There were a great many accounts in very early times, of stones having
fallen from the sky. In China and some other eastern nations, they have
long had a notion that such occurrences were connected with political
events, and accordingly they have kept careful records of what they
have known to fall for centuries back. This was a vain superstition,
but it was not more vain than the incredulity with which these reports
were received by nearly all the learned of Europe, till about forty
years ago. They denied the existence of aerolites, for no other reason
than because they had not seen them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account