Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo IIIAllies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Islamic
Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo III
Allies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Christianity and other religions -- Islam; Church history -- Middle Ages, 600-1500; Papacy; Papacy -- History
It was the providence of God that the chalif himself never allowed the
sworn protector of the Church who sat on the eastern throne to execute
this threat. Rather he was all through this century in dread lest the
Mohammedan, having fixed his throne at Damascus, should advance it to
Constantinople. It was again the providence of God that Constantinople
itself should not fall during this time of its utmost weakness, and so
open the whole of northern Europe to Mohammedan domination. The city of
Constantine was then the material rampart which stopped the impetuous
current of Saracen invasion to the north. The chalif Muawiah, who reigned
over the immense Saracen empire from 661 to 680, was strong enough
continually to beat the Emperor, to ravage his Asiatic territory, to
advance towards his capital, but he was never able to take it. The advance
of the seat of the Saracenic empire from the remote Medina to the near and
beautiful Damascus, the paradise of eastern cities, dwelling in its
perpetual garden among ever-flowing waters of Abana and Pharpar, was
itself a sign how the empire had fallen. A religion founded on the denial
of the Christian faith, of which it was, moreover, the special rival, had
full possession of the once Roman and Christian East. Muawiah became
chalif on the death of Ali in 661. He had conducted the civil war against
Ali, which distracted for five years the Saracen power, with the forces of
Syria, as its governor; and when he became supreme made it the capital of
his empire.
Constans II., having crowned with martyrdom the greatest confessor of the
West, Pope Martin, and the greatest confessor of the East, St. Maximus,
resolved in the year 662, to visit the West. The tyranny of Constans in
regard to the Pope was not completed even by his treatment of St Martin.
When he had condemned this Pope, but before he had caused his death he is
supposed to have compelled the Roman clergy to elect another Pope. This
was Eugenius, who was recognised in the year 654 for Pope, while St.
Martin was yet alive.(113) Whether the urgency and threats of the imperial
ministers overcame at length the constancy of the clergy, or whether, as
is more probable, they feared to see some heretic sent by the emperor to
occupy the throne of St. Peter, they elected Eugenius, by birth a Roman, a
person of great goodness and holy life, who held the See two years and
eight months. The synodical letter of Peter, the fourth Monothelite
patriarch of Constantinople in succession was sent to him, but being
obscure in its expressions about our Lord, was sent back with
indignity.(114) It would seem that the exceeding danger of the time caused
the election and consecration of Pope Eugenius in the lifetime of St.
Martin, to pass for legitimate. Eugenius died in 657, and was succeeded by
Pope Vitalian, after a vacancy of a month and 29 days.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account