Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo IIIAllies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Islamic
Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo III
Allies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Christianity and other religions -- Islam; Church history -- Middle Ages, 600-1500; Papacy; Papacy -- History
Had Pope Severinus at this moment failed in his duty, the whole Church
would have been involved in the Monothelite heresy. Not only Pope
Severinus, but his successors during forty years, were the sole stay of
the Church against a heresy—the last root of the condemned Eutychean
heresy—which overthrew the true doctrine of the Incarnation, making our
Lord Jesus Christ not God and Man in one Person, but a Person compounded
out of God and Man, and therefore not Man at all. The whole temporal power
of the Byzantine sovereign, at that time despotic lord of Rome, and backed
by subservient patriarchs, Sergius, Pyrrhus, Paulus, and Peter, was
exerted to compel the Popes who sat during these forty years to accept the
false doctrine presented to them in an imperial decree.(21) The successive
Popes in this time, Severinus, John IV., Theodore I., St. Martin I., St.
Eugenius I., St. Vitalian, Deusdedit, Donus I., rejected and condemned the
decision urged upon them by the imperial and patriarchal pressure, all of
them at the risk of every sort of persecution—one, St. Martin, at the cost
of a singularly painful and glorious martyrdom. The next Pope, St. Agatho,
condemned the heresy in a General Council allowed at Constantinople itself
by an orthodox emperor over which his legates presided. The Pope
succeeding him, St. Leo II. ratified the condemnation by the Council of
four successive Byzantine patriarchs, Sergius, Pyrrhus, Paulus and Peter,
as heretics, and censured the negligence of Honorius in not extinguishing
at once so dangerous a flame. In truth it had held the life of the Church
in suspense during more than forty years. Had one of the ten successors of
Honorius failed, all would have been lost, so near to the precipice was
the Byzantine despotism and the State patriarchate, subservient to it, and
supplying it obediently with theological knowledge sufficient to formulate
heresy, allowed by the Divine Providence in that fearful century to drive
the Church. And precisely during these years the new Arabian conqueror—the
chalif of Mohammed—cut in two the empire which was attempting this
parricide. When Heraclius went forth committing his city and his son to
God, to the holy Mother of God, and to his bishop, he triumphed for the
only time in the long Roman history over Rome’s eastern rival, and brought
back the Cross from Persia to Constantinople, and then carried it in
dutiful homage to be replaced in its old shrine where our Lord suffered at
Jerusalem. When at the bidding of that very bishop Sergius he tampered
with the Christian faith, and oppressed the successor of St. Peter, he
lost Jerusalem, Alexandria, and Antioch, with the great provinces which
belonged to them. Out of the four patriarchates of his empire, three
became subject to the Mohammedan chalif. The subjection came suddenly, but
has lasted with a short interval from that time to this. The conquest, as
yet unbroken, of Mohammed over Christian peoples dates from the perfidy of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account