Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo IIIAllies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Islamic
Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo III
Allies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Christianity and other religions -- Islam; Church history -- Middle Ages, 600-1500; Papacy; Papacy -- History
We have now to follow briefly one of the greatest revolutions which has
ever occurred in human affairs. It is a revolution which not merely sets
up one kingdom instead of another, or alters the persons of individual
rulers; but which changes human society to its very depths, provides a
different standard of morals, and, so far as it succeeds, but only so far,
reverses the course of Christian civilisation, and undoes in certain
countries the greatest conquests which the Christian Church had obtained
for the good of the human race. Not States only are changed, but fathers
and mothers, husbands and wives, sons and daughters: in fine, Græco-Roman
heathenism has disappeared, but instead of it arises a religion borne on
the shoulders of a temporal rule, and a legislation compared with which in
certain respects that old heathenism was pure and benignant. The
revolution reaches in fact man’s belief in the nature of God Himself: and
a change of belief in the nature of God involves a change in all His
relations to His moral creatures, and in their relations to each other.
The creature in all action reproduces what it holds concerning the
Creator. The religion of self-sacrifice springs from a God who sacrifices
Himself: the religion of self-indulgence from a God from whose worship
sacrifice has been expunged.
It(50) appears that even before the triumphal entry of Heraclius into
Jerusalem with the recovered cross he had met in the Persian campaigns, in
622 or 623, with a certain bishop named Cyrus, then holding the see of
Phasis, in Armenia. But Cyrus himself had for years before been in
communication with Sergius, the powerful patriarch of Constantinople, the
guide and inspirer of the emperor. Sergius had held the see of the capital
since the year 610, in which the accession of Heraclius took place. It had
been all along his dream to reconcile the various monophysite sects which
troubled his master’s empire. In the political point of view such a
reconciliation could not but appear very important. In Egypt alone the
Monophysites numbered about six millions, against three hundred thousand
orthodox.(51) How deeply their national feeling was mixed up with their
heresy is shown by the name of Melchites or Royalists, which they gave to
their opponents. The patriarch Sergius and the emperor Heraclius fell upon
the device of gaining the heretical party, not only in Egypt, but in the
Eastern empire generally, to at least an outward union with the orthodox
by introducing the formula “One Operation” as a theological expression for
the acts of our Lord. St. John of Damascus(52) describes in his treatise
on heresies the 99th as that of the Monothelites “who derived their origin
from Cyrus of Alexandria, and their strength from Sergius of
Constantinople. These men maintained two Natures in Christ, and one
Person, but assert one Will and one Operation, by which they destroy the
duality of natures, and strongly adhere to the doctrines of Apollinarius.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account