Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo IIIAllies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Islamic
Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo III
Allies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Christianity and other religions -- Islam; Church history -- Middle Ages, 600-1500; Papacy; Papacy -- History
Now Sergius, uniting great ability and strong character to his position as
bishop of the capital city and minister of the Emperor Heraclius,
dominated his mind. Heraclius exerted himself greatly to disseminate the
formulary of these two patriarchs. His purpose was that of drawing
together his own distracted empire. This purpose of Heraclius is carried
back so far at least as the year 628. Nay, at the beginning of his
campaign against the Persians he recommended it. How much more when by the
peace of the year 628 he recovered the provinces which had been taken from
him.(53) It would seem that the faltering of Heraclius in the faith, which
he was willing to subject to a deceptive compromise the doctrine of the
incarnation itself, was coincident in time with the opening of the
Mohammedan era, the hegira or flight of Mohammed from Mecca, which marks
his assumption of the claim to propagate by force a conquering religion.
That claim was in a few years to cost Heraclius the half of his empire. It
is certain that about the year 630 he promoted Cyrus to be patriarch of
Alexandria. He also put a certain Athanasius of like doctrine into the see
of Antioch, and thus three patriarchal sees at once were in favour of the
heresy. And Sergius wrote to Pope Honorius commending it as a wonderful
mode of restoring unity to the Church in the East.
Cyrus drew up nine heads of doctrine, by which he thought that he had
reconciled the Theodosians and other powerful sects in Egypt. His
announcement was received with exceeding joy by Sergius at Constantinople.
Sergius wrote to Pope Honorius describing the action of Cyrus in these
words: “Certain dogmatic heads were agreed upon between the two sides, in
consequence of which those who but yesterday were parted into divisions
and acknowledged the wicked Dioscorus and Severus as their ancestors, were
united to the one most holy Catholic Church, and all the people of
Alexandria, beloved by Christ, and besides this we may say all Egypt and
Thebais and Libya, and the other dioceses of the Egyptian province, became
one flock of Christ our true God. They who were until then to be seen an
innumerable multitude of divided heresies, now, by the good pleasure of
God and the zeal well-pleasing to Him of the most holy prelate of
Alexandria, have all become one, with one voice and unity of spirit,
confessing the true doctrines of the Church.”(54)
Such was the picture set before Pope Honorius by the patriarch Sergius,
then in the height of his credit as bishop of the imperial city and prime
minister of the emperor, in the year 633, when Abu Bekr was elected the
first of the chalifs to carry on the power of Mohammed, who had died a few
months before. A few years after this supposed reunion of all, these same
Egyptians welcomed submission to Omar, the second chalif and successor of
Abu Bekr, as lord of Egypt, who would, as they thought, be more favourable
to them than Heraclius.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account