Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo IIIAllies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Islamic
Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo III
Allies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Christianity and other religions -- Islam; Church history -- Middle Ages, 600-1500; Papacy; Papacy -- History
Thus the wide eastern empire instead of worshipping in union of heart and
gladness of spirit that transcendent mystery in which is throned the
grandeur and the mercy of the Christian dispensation, instead of falling
in prostrate adoration before that vision of condescending love which the
angels desire to look into, broke itself into endless conflicts in
disputing about it, until the mystery of grace became a rancorous jarring
of ambitious rivals. During more than 200 years this suicidal conflict was
engaged in ruining the resources of a vast dominion, which in the hands of
a Constantine or a Theodosius, with the spirit of a St. Leo to guide them,
would have been impregnable to every enemy. Had emperor and people been
faithful to the Council of Chalcedon, and to the authority which they
admitted to be based on a divine promise made to St. Peter, neither the
disunited hordes of the North, nor the far inferior savages of the South,
nor even the impact of the great Sassanide empire would have availed to
overcome the Roman power. This last and greatest enemy Heraclius had
subdued. He went forth in the name of the Crucified One whom Chosroes had
called upon him to disavow, and won the fight. Yet even as he was carrying
back the Cross and entering the Holy City in triumph, Heraclius had become
a traitor to him whom he was professing to honour. He had already
conceived, under an evil influence and by the inspiration of the patriarch
at his right hand, a compromise of doctrine which he thought would induce
the rebellious Egyptian people to return to his allegiance. He hoped also
that the same compromise would exorcise the Nestorian spirit at Antioch.
They who did not agree were to be drawn into an appearance of agreement by
an ambiguous formula. And the See of the Apostle Peter, last and greatest
witness of the true doctrine, was to be forced into accepting the deceit,
and ratifying it for the old truth by submitting to an imperial decree,
which, independent of the heresy contained in it, was a violation of the
Church’s liberty.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account