Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part I. For the year 1757.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world. — John Shaqi
Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part I. For the year 1757.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.Various
History
Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part I. For the year 1757.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.
Various
Science -- Periodicals
As to the duration of the great shock, people have differed widely,
viz. from 1’ to 6 or 7. Our printed accounts have generally fixed it
to about 2’, or 3 at the most; but as these were only the uncertain
guesses of persons, who had no rule to guess by, no dependence can
be had on them. I am well satisfied, that with us it continued 4’,
or rather 4’ 1-half; taking in the whole of the time, from the first
agitation of the earth till it was become perfectly quiet; tho’ the
violence of the shock did not last above half so long. This I am
assured of, partly from the observations of some gentlemen, who were
up, and looked on their watches, when it began and ended; one of whom
tells me it was 4’, and another, that it was near 5; and partly from
my own observations, which were as follow. The preceding noon I had
adjusted both my clock and watch to the apparent time, by a meridian
line; and the following noon I found, that the watch had kept time
exactly. Being awaked by the earthquake, I lay till the violence
of it seemed to be over for the second time, the first abatement
happening just after I waked. Till then I forbore to rise, because the
agitation was so vehement, that I concluded it would be difficult, if
not impracticable, to go from the bed to the chimney, without being
thrown down; and therefore thought it best not to attempt it. The
space of time, in which I lay awake, I cannot think to be much, if any
thing, less than 2’. This was the conjecture I formed at that time;
though, it being but conjecture, I would not lay very great stress
upon it, were it not supported by concurring observations. On the
second abatement I rose, and lighting a candle, looked on my watch,
and found it to be 15’ after four. The shock then was not quite over,
but the windows continued rattling for about a minute longer, as near
as I can remember; for the shock went off very gradually. As soon as
I had looked on the watch, I went directly to the clock, which was in
another chamber, that I might see whether that agreed with the watch,
and found that it was stopt at 4ʰ 11’ 35’'. Its stopping, however, was
not immediately owing to the violence of the shock, though several
clocks, and watches too, at Boston, are said to have been stopped by
it, but to the following accident: Having some time before used a
pretty long glass tube, in a particular experiment, I had shut it up
in the clock-case for security; and this tube, being overthrown by the
earthquake, lodged against the pendulum, and stopt its motion. By this
accident, the beginning of the earthquake, I conceive, is determined
with all the exactness, that can be desired; for, so far as I can
learn, the first shake was violent enough to overset so tall, slender
a body, and standing in a position so near a perpendicular, as that
tube; and it was impossible for the pendulum to make one oscillation,
after the tube had struck against it. But I am not able to fix the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account