Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part II. For the year 1758.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.Various
History
Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part II. For the year 1758.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.
Various
Science -- Periodicals
In his description of the Cinnamon of Ceylon, he supposes differences
in the manner of veining the leaf, which are not found in the leaves
themselves. He supposes, that the Cinnamon of Ceylon differs from
that of Malabar by its berries growing in cups like acorns; which
is apparently the same in both, as may be seen in its figure in the
_Hortus Malabaricus_.
The other differences taken notice of by the botanic writers are as
follow:
In the _Flora Zeylanica_, p. 545. and in the _Materia Medica_, 190. the
Cinnamon of Ceylon is called _Laurus foliis trinerviis ovato-oblongis
nervis unientibus_: which description is adhered to in the _Hortus
Cliffordiensis_, p. 154. under the name _Laurus foliis oblongo-ovatis
nitidis planis_. And Burman, in his _Flora Zeylanica_, 62. T. 27. calls
it _Cinamomum foliis latis ovatis_. Whereas the Cassia of Sumatra is
distinguished by these writers: that in _Flora Zeyl._ 146. and in
_Materia Medica_, 191. is called _Laurus foliis trinerviis lanceolatis
nervis supra basin unitis_: and Burman, _Zeylan._ 63. T. 28. calls it
_Cinamomum perpetuo florens folio tenuiore acuto_.
The distinction therefore, which these writers would make us believe
there is between these plants, consists in the leaves of the one being
oval, the other sharp-pointed; and that the nerves are limited at the
bottom in the Cinnamon, but not so in the Cassia: for as to the _semper
florens_, mentioned by Burman, that must undoubtedly be common to both.
Now as to the different shape of the leaves, we know how often this
happens by seminal varieties, and from the age of plants, as in the
leaves of holly and ivy; and that even the shapes of leaves vary
greatly on the very same plant, and sometimes on the same branch; as in
the ash, and many other plants, the leaves of the young shoots are more
oval than those on the old boughs, which are generally more pointed.
But this variety is much more frequent in the plants of warm countries.
In the sassafras, part of the leaves generally near the bottom of the
plant are plain, whilst the other leaves are divided into three lobes
or segments. I have observed great difference also in the leaves of
almost every one of the American oaks.
In the Virginian cedar, the berries of the same plant produce some
plants with juniper leaves, and others with leaves like the savin; and
some plants with both leaves growing on the same plant.
I must observe that Burman has, in his figures of the two plants before
mentioned, made them extremely different. In that of Ceylon he has made
all the leaves oval; and, to make the difference greater, has drawn the
rudiments of the berries; to which he has added the flower, or part of
it, at the top of the style or rudiment of the fruit: and in that of
Malabar he has drawn the flower growing in the umbel.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account