Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part II. For the year 1758.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.Various
History
Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part II. For the year 1758.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.
Various
Science -- Periodicals
The description of Mr. Ray of the flower, in his description of the
Cinnamon of Malabar, is extremely accurate; as is also the figure in
the _Hortus Malabaricus_, Nº. 54. and the description, fol. 107. under
the name Carua. I shall therefore refer to those.
I shall not trouble you with the question debated by Mr. Ray, whether
the Cinnamon and Cassia of the ancients were, or were not, the same
with those so called by the moderns? whether the Cinnamon of the
ancients was the twigs of the tree bearing cloves, or any plant now
unknown to us? Mr. Ray has largely treated on this subject; and to him
I refer such as are curious to be informed on this subject.
But as the Cinnamon and Cassia of the ancients are said to have been
used as perfumes, and to make perfumed ointments, I think they must
have differed from ours, whose smell is not very fragrant, nor is
emitted to any great distance.
The matter of the present inquiry is, whether the Cinnamon of Ceylon
is the same sort of plant with that growing in Malabar, Sumatra, _&c._
differing only by the soil or climate, in which it grows, which is the
opinion of Garcias; or from the culture or manner of curing the plant,
as I am inclined to believe; or whether it is really a different genus
or species of plant, as many people believe, and some botanical writers
seem to indicate.
I shall endeavour to explain this matter by producing, 1st, The
descriptions of the most celebrated authors:
2dly, By producing the most accurate figures of the plants of Sumatra
and Ceylon: [_See Tab._ xxxvi.]
3dly, By shewing the specimen of the leaves and branches brought from
Sumatra.
I have no specimen from Ceylon; but have carefully examined the
specimens kept in the British Museum, with the assistance of Dr. Maty
and Mr. Empson, and compared them with the specimens I have from
Sumatra; from whence I traced exactly the figures brought herewith:
which specimens are undoubtedly brought from Ceylon, and were the
collections of Boerhaave, Courteen, Plukenet, and Petiver.
But, previous to this inquiry, I would premise, that the writers, who
give the description of the Cinnamon of Ceylon, were probably not
acquainted with that of Malabar at the time of their publishing their
works.
Mr. Ray also, who so accurately describes the flower of the Cinnamon
of Malabar, seems not so well acquainted with its fruit; and probably
had then never seen the specimens of the Cinnamon from Ceylon; for his
description is plainly borrowed from others, and not his own. Tho’ I
have reason to think he afterwards saw the specimens of Mr. Courteen,
and was convinced, that the plants were the same.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account