Philosophumena; or, The refutation of all heresies, Volume IHippolytus, Antipope
Philosophy
Philosophumena; or, The refutation of all heresies, Volume I
Hippolytus, Antipope
Christian heresies -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Occultism; Philosophy, Ancient
But let us take the figures given in the text for the intervals between
the Earth and the seven “planets” arranged in the same order, and again
taking the Earth to Moon distance as unity, we have:--
TABLE II (_of intervals_)
Interval between ♁ and ☽ = 5,554,130 stadia or _x_
“ ” ☽ “ ☉ = 11,088,260 ” 2_x_
“ ” ☉ “ ♀ = 16,632,390 ” 3_x_
“ ” ♀ “ ☿ = 22,176,520 ” 4_x_(2²)
“ ” ☿ “ ♂ = 49,897,170 ” 9_x_(3²)
“ ” ♂ “ ♃ = 44,353,040 ” 8_x_(2³)
“ ” ♃ “ ♄ = 149,691,510 ” 27_x_(3³)
This agrees almost entirely with the theory which M. Bigourdan in the
work mentioned in the last note has worked out as the Platonic theory
of the distances of the different planets from the Earth, “the supposed
centre of their movements” (p. 228). Thus:--
Planets ☽ ☉ ♀ ☿ ♂ ♃ ♄
Distances 1 2 3 4 8 9 27
which distances are, in his own words, “les termes enchevêtrés de deux
progressions géométriques ayant respectivement pour raison 2 et 3,
savoir 1, 2, 4, 8--1, 3, 9, 27; on voit que l’unité est, comme chez
Pythagore, la distance de la Terre à la Lune.” This conclusion is
amply borne out by Hippolytus’ figures, which, as given in Table II
above, show a regular progression from 2 and 3 to 2² and 3², then
to 2³ and 3³, which explains what our author means by increasing
the Earth to the Moon distance, κατὰ τὰ διπλάσιον καὶ τριπλάσιον. The
only discrepancy between this and M. Bigourdan’s table is that he has
transposed the distances between ☿--♂ and ♂--♄ respectively; but as
I do not know the details of the calculation on which he bases his
figures, I am unable to say whether the mistake is his or Hippolytus’.]
[Footnote 67: Are we to conclude from this that these last calculations
are those of Claudius Ptolemy, the author of the _Almagest_? He has
certainly not been mentioned before, but his fame was so great that
Hippolytus may have been certain that the allusion would be understood
by his audience. Ptolemy lived, perhaps, into the last quarter of the
second century.]
[Footnote 68: Genesis vi. 4. The subject seems to have had irresistible
fascination for Christian converts of Asiatic blood, whether orthodox
or heretic. Manes also wrote a book upon the Giants, cf. Kessler,
_Mani_, Berlin, 1899, pp. 191 ff.]
[Footnote 69: Hippolytus seems to have been entirely ignorant that
the calculations he derides were anything but mere guesswork. They
were not only singularly accurate considering the imperfection of the
observations at the disposal of their author, but have also been of
the greatest use to science as laying the foundation of all future
astronomy.]
[Footnote 70: ἀμέτρους. Another pun on their _measurements_.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account