The observing slit, 6 feet wide, extends considerably beyond the zenith.
It is closed by a double shutter, which is operated by an endless rope.
The upper part, within the dome, is also closed by a hood, or shield,
which serves to protect the telescope from any water that may find its way
through the shutter, and which is rolled back to the north when
observations are made near the zenith. I have recently fitted the lower
half of the slit with a wind-screen, which has proved to be a most useful
addition. It is made of tarpaulin, attached to slats which slide between
the two main girders, and is raised or lowered by halliards, which belay
to cleats on the north rail of the gallery. A more detailed description of
the dome has been given in an article by Mr. Crossley,[4] from which the
reduced figure in Fig. 1[5] has been taken.
The mounting of the three-foot reflector has been very completely
described and illustrated by Dr. Common,[6] so that only a very general
description need be given here. The most important feature of the
mounting is that the telescope tube, instead of being on one side of the
polar axis, as in the usual construction, is central, so that the axis of
the mirror and the polar axis are in the same line when the telescope is
directed to the pole. The declination axis is short, and is supported by a
massive goose-neck bolted to the upper end of the polar axis. The mirror
is placed just _above_ the declination axis. Its weight, and the weight of
the whole tube and eye-end, are counterpoised by slabs of lead, placed in
two iron boxes, between which the goose-neck of the polar axis passes. The
great advantage of this arrangement, and the controlling principle of the
design, is that the telescope is perfectly free to pass the meridian at
all zenith distances. No reversal of the instrument is needed, or is
indeed possible.
[Illustration: THE CROSSLEY REFLECTOR.]
For long-exposure photography, the advantage above referred to is obvious,
but it is attended by certain disadvantages. One of these is that a very
much larger dome is required than for the usual form of mounting. Another
is the great amount of dead weight which the axes must carry; for the
mirror, instead of helping to counterpoise the upper end of the tube, must
itself be counterpoised. When anything is attached to the eye-end (and in
astrophysical work one is always attaching things to the eye-end of a
telescope), from ten to twenty times as much weight must be placed in the
counterpoise boxes below the declination axis. Where room is to be found
for the weights required to counterpoise the Bruce spectrograph, is a
problem which I have not yet succeeded in solving.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account