Phylogeny of the Waxwings and Allied Birds — John Shaqi
Phylogeny of the Waxwings and Allied BirdsArvey, M. Dale (Martin Dale)
Science
Phylogeny of the Waxwings and Allied Birds
Arvey, M. Dale (Martin Dale)
Bombycillidae -- Phylogeny; Waxwings -- Phylogeny
A critical analysis of the skeletons provides evidence that aids the
student in estimating which differences are merely the result of
habits developed in relatively recent geological time as opposed to
those which owe their existence to more ancient heritage. Stresses
caused by the action of different sets of muscles can apparently
stimulate changes in bones to meet new needs, and the evidence from
genetics is that such mutations in wild birds are minute and
cumulative, rather than of large degree and of sudden appearance. Once
adaptive mutations have occurred, if genetic isolation from one source
or another accompanies it, a new population different from the
parental stock may become established. Study of the skeleton of any
species of living bird may indicate those characters identifiable as
modifications fitting it to a particular environment. If no
distinguishing characters are discovered that may be attributed to
environmental factors, such a species can be spoken of as generalized;
the inference then is that such a species is not modified for a
single, particular ecological niche.
Some parts of the skeleton, obviously, are more adaptable or plastic
than others. The beak seems to be the most adaptable part. Probably
this results from its frequent use; it is the part of the bird to
capture the food. The long bones, meeting the environment as legs
which serve as landing mechanisms or as locomotory appendages, and as
wings which provide considerable locomotion for most birds, probably
come next in order as regards plasticity. In these parts, then, one
may look for the most change in birds, which, within relatively recent
geologic times, have been modified to fit a particular set of
conditions. From the beak and long bones of a species in which habits
are unknown, one can infer the habits and habitat from a comparison
with the skeletal features of species of known habits.
_Skull._--The skulls in all three subfamilies have essentially the
same general appearance and structure, the most marked differences
being, as would be expected, in the bills and associated bones.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account