A terrestrial meridian is a line passing through both poles, all the
points of which have their noon contemporaneously, and a degree of a
meridian is its 360th part. Now, if the earth were a sphere, all degrees
would be of the same length; but, as it is flattened at the poles, the
degrees are longest there, and decrease in length to the equator, where
they are least. The form and size of the earth may therefore be
determined by comparing the length of degrees in different latitudes.[5]
Eleven arcs have been measured in Europe, one in Peru, and two in the
East Indies; but a comparison of no two gives the same result, which
shows that the earth has a slightly irregular form. From a mean of ten
of these arcs, M. Bessel found that the equatorial radius of the earth
is 3963·025 miles, and the polar radius 3949·8 miles nearly. Whence,
assuming the earth to be a sphere, the length of a mean degree of the
meridian is 69·05 British statute miles; therefore 360 degrees, or the
whole circumference of the globe, is 24,858 miles; the diameter, which
is something less than a third of the circumference, is about 8286, or
8000 statute miles; and the length of a geographical mile of 60 to a
degree is 6086·76 feet. The breadth of the torrid zone is 705
geographical miles, the breadth of each of the temperate zones is 645
miles, and that of each of the spaces within the arctic and antarctic
circles 11,431 miles nearly. The Astronomer Royal Mr. Airy’s results,
obtained ten years afterwards, only differ from those of M. Bessel by
127 feet in the equatorial, and 138 feet in the polar radius, quantities
not greater than the length of a ball-room. In consequence of the round
form of the earth, the dip or depression of the horizon is a fathom for
every three miles of distance; that is to say, an object a fathom or six
feet high would be hid by the curvature of the earth at the distance of
three miles. Since the dip increases as the square, a hill 100 fathoms
high, would be hid at the distance of ten miles, and the top of
Dhawalagori, the culminating point of the Himalaya, 28,000 feet high,
would be seen to sink beneath the horizon by a person about 167 miles
off; thus, when the height is known, an estimate can be formed of the
distance of a mountain.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account