Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
I do not agree with my school here, for I cannot think a comet is a 1
sudden fire, but I rank it among Nature’s permanent creations. First of
all, everything that the atmosphere creates is short-lived; such things
arise in an element that is fugitive and changeable. How can anything
continue the same for long in the air, which itself never remains the
same? It is always in a state of flux, and its quiet is short-lived. It
changes within a brief moment to another condition from that in which
it had been. It is now rainy, now clear, now alternates from one to 2
the other. The clouds, so intimately connected with it, into which it
collects and from which it is released again, now gather, now disperse,
but never remain at rest. Fire cannot possibly abide securely in a
volatile body, nor can it keep its place so persistently as does a fire
that Nature has fixed never to be dislodged. Further, if the fire stuck
close to its fuel, it would always sink. For the air is the thicker, 3
the nearer it is to the earth. But a comet is never depressed to the
lowest strata of the atmosphere, nor does it ever approach the ground.
Besides, fire either goes in the direction its nature prompts, that is,
upwards, or else in the direction in which it is drawn by the material
on which it has fastened, and on which it feeds.
XXIII
In none of the ordinary fires in the sky is the route curved; it 1
is distinctive of a star (planet) that it describes a curve in its
orbit. Whether other comets had this circular orbit I cannot say.
The two in our own age at any rate had. Again, everything kindled by
a temporary cause quickly gives out. Thus torches gleam only while
they flit across the sky; thus lightning has strength for just one
stroke; thus so-called shooting and falling stars fly past, cutting
through the air. No fires have any considerable duration unless 2
their strength is inherent. I mean the divine fires which the universe
maintains eternally, because they are its parts and works. These, I
say, are always active; they have an orbit the even tenor of which they
preserve, and they are uniform. They would on alternate days be larger
or smaller if the fire was merely casual, the sudden outcome of some
accidental cause. Such a fire would be greater or less according as it
was fed more abundantly or more scantily. I said a moment ago that no
fire could be lasting which arose from some defect in the atmosphere. I
have now to add further, that it can by no means be fixed and steady. 3
Both torch and lightning and shooting star, and any other kind of fire
forced out of the air by pressure, are in flight; none of them is
visible save in the course of its fall. But a comet has its own settled
position. For that reason it is not expelled in haste, but steadily
traverses its course; it is not snuffed out, but takes its departure.
If it were a wandering star (_i.e._ planet), says some one, it would
be in the zodiac.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account