Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
Who, say I, ever thinks of placing a single bound to
the stars? or of cooping up the divine into narrow space? These very 4
stars, which you suppose to be the only ones that move, have, as every
one knows, orbits differing one from another. Why, then, should there
not be some stars that have a separate distinctive orbit far removed
from them? What reason is there why there should not be passages into
the heavens at some part of them?[98] But if you are convinced that
every star (planet) cannot but touch the zodiac, then I say the comet
might have such a wide orbit that at some point it may coincide with
the zodiac. This is not necessary, but it is possible.
[98] The meaning seems to be, there may be passages--inlets and
outlets--by which occasional visitants like comets may temporarily
enter the heavens as we know them, and subsequently pass out of them.
The text is doubtful.
XXIV
Consider whether it is not more in keeping with the size of the 1
universe that it be supposed to be divided into many routes, and do not
keep this one beaten track while every other portion is a waste. Do
you suppose that in this great and fair creation, among the countless
stars that adorn the night with varied beauty, never suffering the
atmosphere to become empty and sluggish, there are only five stars that
are allowed to move freely, while all the rest stand still, a fixed,
immovable crowd? Should any one here ask me: Why, then, has their 2
course not been observed like that of the five planets? my answer to
him shall be: There are many things whose existence we allow, but whose
character we are still in ignorance of. We shall all admit that we have
a mind, by whose behest we are urged forward and called back; but what
that mind is which directs and rules us, no one can explain any more
than he can tell where it resides. One will say that it is breath;
another, a kind of harmony; another, a divine force and part of God;
another, subtlest air; another, disembodied power. Some will even be
found to call it blood, or heat. So far is the mind from being clear on
all other subjects that it is still in search of itself.
XXV
Why should we be surprised, then, that comets, so rare a sight in the 1
universe, are not embraced under definite laws, or that their beginning
and end are not known, seeing that their return is at long intervals?
It is not yet fifteen hundred years since Greece
Counted the number of the stars and named them every one.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account