Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
We cannot, Apollonius says, see through the stars what is beyond, but
sight passes easily through the comets. Well, in the first place, if 2
that is the case, it is not so in the part of the body which consists
of dense solid fire, but only where the dispersed glow extends as it
breaks up into the appearance of hair. One can see through the gaps in
the fire and not through the fire itself. Stars again, it is said, are
all round, comets extended; whence it is plain that they are not true
stars. But who, pray, will allow that comets are long? Their tendency
like that of other stars is to a globe shape, only the light from them
is prolonged. The sun shoots out his rays far and wide, but has himself
a shape different from that of the light that streams from him. So
in comets, the body is rounded, but the glow from them presents the
appearance of being longer than that of the other stars.
XXVII
Why is this so, you ask. Do you tell me first why the light the 1
moon receives is wholly unlike the sun although she receives it from
the sun. Why is it now ruddy, now pale? why is her colour ashen or
black when she is cut off from the sun’s view? Or tell me why all the
stars have aspects to some extent dissimilar to one another and all as
different as possible from the sun. It is no hindrance to their being
true stars that they are not all alike; so there is nothing to prevent
comets from being permanent through all time, sharing the same destiny
as the other stars, even though they have not an appearance like
theirs. Besides, is not the universe, if you will only examine it 2
carefully, made up of contrarieties? Why is it that the sun should be
always blazing hot in Leo, scorching the ground with his fierce glow,
while in Aquarius he brings winter’s chain and closes the rivers with
ice? The one constellation is subject to the same law as the other,
though its characteristics and influence are so different. Aries again
rises in a moment, Libra lifts its scales very slowly; yet the one
sign is of the same nature as the other, though that one mounts in a
brief space, this comes forth very deliberately. Do you not see, too,
how contrary the elements are to one another? They are heavy and 3
light, cold and hot, moist and dry. The whole concord of the universe
is a harmony of discords. You say a comet is not a star, because its
form does not correspond to the type, but is unlike other stars. You
can see, no doubt, how very like that star that returns to its place
after thirty years is to this which revisits its haunt within the
year! Nature does not turn out her work according to a single pattern;
she prides herself upon her power of variation. She has made some 4
things larger, some swifter than others; some stronger, some more
limited in power; some she has separated from the crowd, that their
splendid isolation might render their progress conspicuous; some she
has consigned to a place in the common herd.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account