Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
The word “air” occurs in the text over 200 times, but not always as
a translation of the same Latin word. With a term so elastic and
so ambiguous it would have been mere pedantry to attempt a uniform
rendering; and indeed such uniform rendering would have been more
misleading than the course adopted of rendering according to the
context, which the idiom of our language seemed to demand.
Seneca has two main terms for air--_aër_ and _spiritus_. _Aër_
means, generally speaking, either air generically, or the atmosphere
specifically. _Spiritus_, on the other hand, denotes air under certain
conditions of tension, or strain, or pressure, when it is capable
of exerting force or violence; to its influence are attributed many
effects due in reality to gases, or other causes. On p. 52, l. 1, we
have the definition “air (_spiritus_) is the atmosphere (_aër_) in
violent motion”; and on p. 205 the concluding words of V. xiii. are
“air differs from wind in degree alone. A more violent air is a wind;
air in turn is gently flowing atmosphere,” where again _spiritus_ is
“air” and _aër_ “atmosphere.”
Again, in the _Aetna_, l. 212, we read, “The winds when inflated
are called _spirit_; when in subsidence, _air_” (Professor Ellis’s
translation), where the same terms _spiritus_ and _aër_ are
employed.[123]
[123] For a discussion of the meaning of the term _spiritus_ and the
parallelisms in its use by Seneca and the author of the _Aetna_, see
Professor Ellis’s edition of that poem, Prolegomena, pp. xl-xliii.
Now if our author had been consistent in the use of the words, there
would have been a strong case for a uniform adoption of “air” and
“atmosphere,” whenever they occurred. But numerous passages might be
cited to show that he interchanges the words without apparent motive,
just as we do “air” and “atmosphere.” For example, on p. 69, l. 2, “So
fire will pass into air (_spiritus_),” while on p. 71, l. 9, “the air
(_aër_), which is interchangeable with fire.” Again, on p. 75, l. 6,
“When the clouds have enclosed air” (_spiritus_); l. 26, “atmosphere
(_aër_) shut up in a hollow cloud.” A still more conclusive case,
though the passage is probably in other respects corrupt, occurs in the
last sentence of c. xxix. p. 77, where the first “air” is _spiritus_,
the second, a mere synonym or variant, is _aër_. Cf. p. 187, l. 27, and
the passages cited below from pp. 245, 249, 251, 259, 260.
The translator has little choice. He must follow his author, and,
where the latter makes a distinction, must endeavour to reproduce it;
otherwise he must, as the author did, observe the idiom of his own
language.
In accordance with this principle _aër_ is usually translated
“atmosphere,” and _spiritus_ “air”; but circumstances have rendered
unavoidable a considerable number of exceptions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account