Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the communityHooker, Worthington
Science
Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the community
Hooker, Worthington
Medical ethics; Physician and patient; Physicians; Quacks and quackery
It is rather difficult for the unskilled mind of a ‘regular’ to
reconcile with the ‘simple and plain theory’ of Thompson, these
facts—that persons sometimes die with a great degree of heat upon
them—that heat sometimes remains in the body for a long time after
death—that in the cholera there is occasionally found after death a
great amount of heat, though the patient’s body was very cold for
many hours before death, &c. I once asked a Thompsonian the reason
of this last fact. ‘Why,’ said he, ‘that is plain enough—the disease
was so powerful it kept down the heat, but when the patient died,
the disease let go, and then the heat came out.’ The answer was at
least ingenious. But Thompson says, ‘if the heat gains the victory,
the cold will be disinherited, and health will be restored.’ The warm
corpse of the cholera patient ought, therefore, to have revived.
It is asserted by the followers of Thompson, that there is no need of
‘learned doctors.’ They declare that ‘the whole theory and practice,
is perfectly plain and simple, requiring no study of the dead
languages to comprehend it, thereby enabling any person of common
capacity to practice with a certainty of success, in all ordinary
cases of disease, and this too with but a few hours instruction.’
And, Thompson himself speaks of the art of medicine, as being as
plain and as easy, as the clearing of ‘a stove and the pipe, when
clogged with soot.’
The Thompsonian system dispenses with the services of ‘learned
doctors,’ for another reason also. It claims that, while other
medicines invariably injure the system, the Thompsonian remedies
always benefit it, both in sickness and in health. No matter how much
they are used, nor at what times—they always do good, for they have,
it is claimed, a natural relation to the system. Many Thompsonians
carry this idea still farther than this. A prominent physician of
this class, one sufficiently orthodox and accomplished to be for a
long time an editor of one of their papers, attributed a sort of
selecting power to lobelia. He said, that it would never bring up
anything that it ought not to bring up, and that if a man with a foul
stomach, should eat a good dinner, and then take lobelia, nothing but
the bad matter would be thrown off, and the dinner would stay there
to nourish the system.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account