Another statement made by Jaffa may be quoted in this connection, since it illustrates the attitude taken by many physiologists on this question. “Even if it could be proved,” says Jaffa, “by a large number of experiments that nitrogen equilibrium can be maintained on a small amount of protein, it would still be a great question whether or not it would be wise to do so. There must certainly be a constant effort on the part of the human organism to attain this condition, and with a low protein supply it might be forced to do so under conditions of strain. In such a case the bad results might be slow in manifesting themselves, but might also be serious and lasting. It has also been suggested that when living at a fairly high protein level the body is more resistant to disease and other strains than when the protein level is low.” While these suggestions demand careful consideration, it is equally evident that there is another side to the question, viz., the possible danger to the body from the physiological action of the larger amounts of nitrogenous waste products which result from an excess of proteid food, and which float about through the system prior to their excretion. In addition, we must not overlook the great loss of energy to the body in handling and getting rid of the surplus of unnecessary food of whatever kind introduced into the alimentary tract, to say nothing of the danger of intestinal putrefaction and toxæmia when from any cause the system loses its ability to digest and absorb the excess of food consumed. Further, the possible strain on the kidneys and other organs must not be overlooked. Hence we may well query on which side lies the greater danger. To an unprejudiced observer, one not wedded to old-time tradition, it would seem as if great effort was being made to sustain the claims of a high-proteid intake. It is surely well to be careful, but it is certainly not necessary to magnify imaginary dangers to the extent of suppressing all efforts toward the establishment of possible physiological economy.