Mr. Pickwick, it will be remembered, made a communication to Mr. Nupkins
which changed the whole state of affairs. Mr. Nupkins, with all his
insolent despotism, was held in check by conference with his clerk,
Jinks, who kept him from making mistakes by judicious hints.
Fang's clerk, like Mr. Jinks, interposed:
"How do you propose to deal with the case, sir?" inquired the clerk,
in a low voice.
Mr. Jinks pulled him by the sleeve and whispered something. He was
evidently remonstrating. At length the magistrate, gulping down with
a very bad grace his disinclination to hear anything more, said
sharply, "What do you want to say?"
When Mr. Fang was about to commit Oliver, the Bookstall-keeper rushed in,
and insisted on being heard, and, like Mr. Nupkins, Mr. Fang had to
listen:
"I demand to be sworn," said the man, "I will not be put down."
"Swear the man," growled Mr. Fang, with a very ill grace. "Now, what
have you got to say?"
Again, Mr. Nupkins said of Sam:
"He is evidently a desperate ruffian."
"He is my servant, sir," said Mr. Pickwick, angrily.
"Oh, he is your servant, is he. A conspiracy to defeat the ends of
justice."
Compare Fang and the Bookseller:
"That book, is it paid for? No, it is not."
"Dear me, I forgot all about it," exclaimed the old gentleman.
"A nice person to prepare a charge against a poor boy," said Fang;
"the law will overtake you yet, &c."
and so on.
In short, Nupkins is a softened edition of Fang. It was curious that he
turned out at the end not altogether so badly, and there is certainly a
little inconsistency in the character. After Mr. Pickwick's disclosures,
he becomes very rational and amiable. We may wonder, too, how the latter
could have accepted hospitality from, or have sat down at the board of,
the man who treated him in so gross a fashion, and, further, that after
accepting this entertainment, Mr. Pickwick should take an heroic and
injured tone, recalling his injuries as he withdrew, but _after_ his
dinner.
This magistrate was despotic enough, but we might have expected that he
would have had Mr. Peter Magnus brought before him also, and have issued
a warrant. The lady, however, was silent as to her admirer, and this
difficulty appears to have occurred to the author for he makes Mr.
Nupkins remark: "The other principal _you say_ has absconded," she having
said nothing whatever. Being at the "White Horse," too, he was
accessible. He may, however, have gone off to secure "a friend."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account