Piebald rats and selection : $b An experimental test of the effectiveness of selection and of the theory of gametic purity in Mendelian crosses — John Shaqi
Piebald rats and selection : $b An experimental test of the effectiveness of selection and of the theory of gametic purity in Mendelian crossesCastle, William E. (William Ernest)
Science
Piebald rats and selection : $b An experimental test of the effectiveness of selection and of the theory of gametic purity in Mendelian crosses
Castle, William E. (William Ernest)
Heredity
6. Upon crossing the selected plus and minus races with each other, the
variability was somewhat increased in F₁ and was further increased in F₂.
The extreme conditions (plus or minus) of the grandparents rarely, if
ever, recur in this generation. Only one individual among 378 F₂ young
has been recorded in a grade as extreme as either grandparent.
7. Hooded animals extracted in F₂ as recessives from a cross with either
Irish or wild rats are as a rule more variable than the selected race
used in making the cross. In crosses with an Irish race the minus series
was affected in like measure. In crosses with wild rats the variability
of the plus series was not appreciably affected (in two experiments it
was slightly reduced, and in one experiment it was slightly increased).
But the variability of the minus race was more than doubled by crosses
with wild rats.
8. The _mean_ of the minus race was lowered by a cross with either the
Irish race or with wild rats, but more extensively by the latter. The
mean of the plus race was lowered a very little by a cross with wild
rats, but considerably by a cross with the Irish race.
DISCUSSION.
It would be possible to suppose, as the senior author has elsewhere
suggested (Castle, 1912), that the Mendelian unit character involved in
these experiments is subject to quantitative variation and that such
quantitative variations have a tendency to persist from generation to
generation. This would account for the effectiveness and permanency of
selection when brought to bear upon the variations. It might also form a
basis for explaining the increased variability which follows crossing,
this being regarded as due to contamination in the heterozygote, but
there are certain other observed effects of crossing which it seems
impossible to account for on this basis. In particular it is observed
that while crossing the minus series makes it _less_ minus as the
hypothesis of contamination would demand, crossing the plus series makes
it _less plus_, the opposite of what a contamination theory would demand.
For we can readily understand, on the basis of contamination, how a +6
gamete being combined with a -2 gamete might change the latter in a plus
direction; but if the same +6 gamete is associated with a +4 gamete we
should expect it, if it has any influence at all, to make this also more
plus, but the observed effect is the opposite; the extracted gametes are
_less_ plus in character.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account