Piebald rats and selection : $b An experimental test of the effectiveness of selection and of the theory of gametic purity in Mendelian crosses — John Shaqi
Piebald rats and selection : $b An experimental test of the effectiveness of selection and of the theory of gametic purity in Mendelian crossesCastle, William E. (William Ernest)
Science
Piebald rats and selection : $b An experimental test of the effectiveness of selection and of the theory of gametic purity in Mendelian crosses
Castle, William E. (William Ernest)
Heredity
If we suppose that the plus race and the minus race differ from each
other by certain “modifiers,” we can not suppose that the plus and the
mutant races differ by these same modifiers. They differ in some other
_single_ respect; perhaps that in which they differ is the _main_ hooded
factor. Are we, then, to suppose that the plus and the minus races _do
not_ differ as regards this same main factor? This can not be stated,
but we see no reason for considering them identical as regards that
factor. It appears that the mutant race arose from the plus race by a
single large plus variation, which seems to have its determiner in some
single component of the germ-cell. But the fact that this change came as
a large quantitative variation does not show that small variations are
impossible in that same cell component. It seems to us quite improbable
that the plus mutation could have arisen in the minus selection
series. We believe that the repeated selection which was practised had
something to do with inducing this change in the plus direction. If one
can increase at will the “modifiers” which make the pigmentation more
extensive, it does not seem strange that after a time a readjustment
should occur within the cell which should incorporate modifiers in that
part of the cell which is responsible for the unit-character behavior of
the hooded pattern. This would amount to a quantitative change in the
unit-character for hooded pigmentation.
BIBLIOGRAPHY.
CASTLE, W. E.
1905. Heredity of coat characters in guinea-pigs and rabbits.
Carn. Inst. Wash. Pub. 23.
1906. The origin of a polydactylous race of guinea-pigs. Carn.
Inst. Wash. Pub. 49.
1912. The inconstancy of unit-characters. American Naturalist,
vol. 46, pp. 352-362.
CASTLE, W. E., and ALEXANDER FORBES.
1906. Heredity of hair-length in guinea-pigs and its bearing on
the theory of pure gametes. Carn. Inst. Wash. Pub. 49.
DE VRIES, H.
1901-1903. Die Mutationstheorie. Veit & Co., Leipzig.
EAST, E. M.
1912. The mendelian notation as a description of physiological
facts. American Naturalist, vol. 46, pp. 633-655.
JENNINGS, H. S.
1909. Heredity and variation in the simplest organisms.
American Naturalist, vol. 43, pp. 321-337.
1910. Experimental evidence on the effectiveness of selection.
American Naturalist, vol. 44, pp. 136-145.
JOHANNSEN, W.
1909. Elemente der exakten Erblichkeitslehre. G. Fischer, Jena.
MACCURDY, H., and W. E. CASTLE.
1907. Selection and cross-breeding in relation to the inheritance
of coat-pigments and coat-patterns in rats and guinea-pigs.
Carn. Inst. Wash. Pub. 70.
PEARL, R.
1913. Genetics and breeding. Science, n. s., vol. 37, pp. 539-546.
TABLES.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account