Man-woman relationships -- Fiction; Marriage -- Fiction; Science fiction
CHAPTER V
Julia wasn't in the apartment when I got home. But Taigue was.
He was sitting in one of the new chairs as though he owned the place.
This time he hadn't come alone. The other chair was occupied by an MEP
patrolman armed with a bludgeon gun.
"Come in," Taigue said. "We've been expecting you."
I don't know why I should have cared after the events of last night,
but the thought of what he might have done to Julia crystallized my
blood. "Where's Julia?" I said.
"Why, what a unique coincidence, Mr. Bartlett. Truly, our minds run
in the same channel, to coin a cliché. I was about to voice the same
plaintive question."
He was still fasting, and the increased gauntness of his face
accentuated the fanatical intensity of his eyes. "If you've hurt her,"
I said, "I'll kill you!"
Taigue's ugly, dolichocephalic head swiveled on his thin neck till he
faced his assistant. "Look who's going to kill someone, Officer Minch.
Our esteemed candidate for the Letter himself!"
That one set me back on my heels. I felt the strength go out of my
legs. "You're out of your mind, Captain. I'm legally married and you
know it!"
"Indeed, Mr. Bartlett?" He reached into the inside pocket of his
coat, withdrew a folded sheet of synthetic paper. He tossed it to me
contemptuously. "Read all about your 'marriage,' Mr. Bartlett. Then
tell me if I'm out of my mind."
I unfolded the gray document, knowing what it was and yet refusing to
accept the knowledge. All warrants for arrest are unpleasant to the
recipient, but an MEP warrant is triply unpleasant.
In addition to being a warrant, it is an indictment, and in addition
to being an indictment, it is a sentence. A marital offender has
automatically waived his right to a trial of any kind by the very
nature of his offense. The logic of the first Puritanical legislators
was muddied by their unnatural horror of illicit sex--an inevitable
consequence of their eagerness to atone for the sexual enormities of
their forebears.
I read the words, first with disbelief, then, as the realization of
Julia's motivation dawned on me, with nausea:
CHARGE: _Adultery, as per paragraph 34 of the Adultery Statute,
which states in effect that all unofficial marital relationships,
regardless of potential ameliorating factors, be construed as
asocial and classified as adulterous acts_.
CORRESPONDENTS: _Roger Bartlett, cit. no. 14479201-B: Julia
Prentice, cit. no. 14489304-P_.
PARTICULARS: _M. I. check, suggested and carried out by MEP Captain
Lawrence Taigue, disclosed discrepancy in compatibility factors of
aforementioned correspondents. Further check revealed deliberate
altering of data cards before M. I. computation, rendering said
computation invalid and resultant 'marriage' unofficial and
therefore adulterous._
SENTENCE: _Public chastisement in the arena of the Municipal
Coliseum_.
DATE OF CHASTISEMENT: _June 20, 2151_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account