Pirate tales from the lawHarris, Arthur M. (Arthur Merton)
History
Pirate tales from the law
Harris, Arthur M. (Arthur Merton)
Pirates
“The men took the goods of all the ships taken, and did what they
pleased with them. I was never near them. They lay in wait for me to
kill me. They took away what they pleased and went to the island;
and I, with about forty men, was left in the ship and we might go
whither we pleased. I will not ask the witness any more questions; so
long as he swears it our words or oaths can not be taken. Palmer is
a loggerhead. Ninety-five men deserted my ship, and went a-roguing
afterwards.
“I was threatened to be shot in the cabin if I would not go along
with the villains. This was the reason I could not come home. They
tried to burn my ship. When they deserted, I was forced to stay by
myself and pick up here a man and there a man to carry her home. Mr.
Bradinham is promised his life to take away mine. It is hard that a
couple of rascals should take away the king’s subjects’ lives; they
are a couple of rogues and rascals. It signifies nothing for me to ask
them anything. They have perjured themselves in many things; about the
guns given to Culliford, that is one thing; he swore I gave them four
guns yesterday, now he says but two. Then he says the ship went from
Plymouth the beginning of May and before he said it was in April. I
have been sworn against by perjured and wicked people.”
By way of defense to the murder charge, he alleged that there was a
mutiny on board, of which Moore was a leader, and the trouble ensued
from that fact. He is borne out in this to some extent by Hugh Parrot,
not a friendly witness, who averred that the seamen had taken up arms
against their captain in the _Loyal Captain_ crisis.
He called a couple of old salts as character witnesses who had fought
by his side against the French and who testified that he had been a
doughty man.
As for the nine common seamen, their geese were more quickly cooked.
They only defended by pleading that they had surrendered under the
king’s proclamation, to which the judges replied that inasmuch as
they had not given themselves up to Captain Warren, or any of the
three special commissioners, they were not within the terms of the
instrument, and could only hope their surrender might at this time
provoke the king’s clemency. Which was but dubious cheer. Three of
them showed they were on board as servants of particular persons and
not as sailors working the ship, and these were cleared.
After very short absences the juries at each trial returned verdicts of
guilty as charged against all except the three servants.
Thus the Captain Kidd of fiction disappears, but not so completely as
those who would have us believe that he was not guilty of piracy at
all. His defense suggests a state of things on board his ships which
is probably true, but the advantage he might have gained from such a
showing is weakened by several circumstances.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account