Apocryphal books (New Testament); Christian heresies -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Gnosticism
It was evidently, therefore, for the information of orthodox persons
that our MS. was made, but not for that of the orthodox public
generally, whether clerical or lay. Had it been so, it would have been
weighted with a running commentary casting scorn upon its erroneous
doctrines, or by so-called refutations like those which encumber the
pages of heresiologists such as Irenæus, Hippolytus, and Epiphanius. Had
it been written by an ecclesiastic, moreover, it would certainly have
borne some preface, or colophon, as does the _Philosophumena_, claiming
merit for, and giving the date of the completion of the work.[48] Yet
there is nothing in the present text to show that it was written by an
ecclesiastic of any kind, while it follows from what has been said above
that it was begun by a scribe who took unusual pains to ensure an
accurate copy, and that when he handed over for a time the continuation
of his work to a subordinate, he yet went over and corrected the
latter’s work with as much care as he bestowed upon his own. All this
suggests that it was made for official or judicial use; and the most
reasonable guess is that it was the draft or copy of a legal document
made for the enlightenment of some conciliar, episcopal, or even secular
tribunal concerned in the suppression of heresy, such as the Inquisitors
of the Faith set up by Theodosius. This would solve the problem which
has so vexed the minds of commentators like Prof. Harnack and Dr.
Schmidt as to the occurrence of the colophon “Part of the Books of the
Saviour” at the foot of the Second and Third Documents. It is natural
enough that the second or subaltern scribe, continuing the work of which
only the first part was once thought sufficient, should preface the
continuation by the title “The Second Tome of Pistis Sophia”; but that
as he completed the copying of each subsequent extract stichometrically
arranged, should add the words: “Part of the Books of the Saviour” to
indicate the collection of MSS., probably seized in a raid by the
Imperial authorities on some heretic’s library, from which they were all
taken.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account