Apocryphal books (New Testament); Christian heresies -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Gnosticism
Such as it was, however, it gave rise to the only complete English
translation of our MS. which has yet appeared in print. Mr. G. R. S.
Mead, then secretary of the Theosophical Society, the year after the
appearance of Amélineau’s French translation, published with the
Theosophical Publishing Company an English translation of the _Pistis
Sophia_, which on its title-page is expressed to be made from
“Schwartze’s Latin Version ... checked by Amélineau’s French Version.”
Mr. Mead laid no claims to proficiency in Coptic, and had already
published more than half his work in a Theosophical magazine before
Amélineau’s version saw the light. His attitude towards the original may
be guessed by the statement in his Preface that the comprehensive
treatment of Gnosticism “requires not only a writer who at least
believes in the possibilities of magic, but also a mystic or at least a
person who is in sympathy with mysticism,” and by the fact that he had
already attempted to explain the Cabalistic Cryptogram on p. 125 by
Sanskrit words. He further states in his Introduction that he proposes
to publish a commentary on the whole book, his Introduction dealing only
with the date and authorship; but up to the present this has not
appeared. It is also evident that in his translation from Schwartze’s
Latin version he has omitted in more than one instance to notice
Petermann’s emendations, which in some cases completely change the
meaning of the passage; and altogether it may be said that the most
valuable part of his work is the short bibliography appended, in which
he gives fairly long extracts from the authors whom he quotes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account