Authors, American -- 20th century -- Biography; Mencken, H. L. (Henry Louis), 1880-1956; Nathan, George Jean, 1882-1958
Their system is very simple and admirably workable. When either, by
any internal or external process, generates an idea for the conduct of
the magazine, he lays it before the other in all its details. This is
always done in writing; never orally. If the other approves the idea he
writes upon the brief the words “Nihil obstat,” and it is forthwith
executed. If, on the contrary, he disapproves, he indorses it with
the word “Veto” and it is returned. The same idea may be revived by
its author thirty days later, but not before. If thrice vetoed it is
forever banned. The office records for the past three years yield the
following:
Plans Proposed Approved Vetoed
By Nathan 18 13 5
By Mencken 12 8 4
In the handling of manuscripts they pursue a somewhat analogous system.
Mencken never reads manuscripts while in New York; all such work he
does in Baltimore. As the offerings of authors are received in the
office they are scrutinized by Nathan’s secretary, and the following
classes are weeded out and immediately returned:
Mss. written in pencil or with green, purple, or red typewriter
ribbons.
Mss. fastened together with ribbons or pins.
Mss. radiating any scent or other odor.
Mss. of plays which begin with soliloquies into a telephone.
Mss. bearing the recommendations of the editors of other magazines.
Mss. accompanied by letters of more than one hundred words.
Mss. accompanied by circulars advertising books written by their
authors or by other printed matter.
Mss. of poetry by poets whose names do not appear upon a list in the
possession of the secretary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account