Tenterden is named, says an old Kentish writer, as “some vulgar fancies
conjecture, from the tenderness of its soil”; Feversham, says another
old Kentish writer, Phillipott, useful as an historian, useless to
etymologists, “is an unhealthy town, and carries the tokens of it in its
name.” _Id. est._, the home of fevers! Harbledown, says Black, is
so-called “in allusion to its grassy downs and hills,” as if grassiness
were not a characteristic of any and every down and hill in Kent.
Gadshill, we are solemnly told, is named from “gads,” clubs used by
footpads who were not unknown there (or anywhere else) on Watling
Street. We should smile less if the name was Padshill.
And one of the most ancient, and indeed prehistoric, names in Kent is
Penypot, a hill opposite Chilham. “Here once,” one old rustic would say,
“they dug up a pot full of pennies.” “Nay,” another would respond, “it
was where they used to sell ale for a penny a pot in the good old days!”
To such vile meanings may descend the venerable Celtic Pen y wlh—the
Head of the Mound.
One of the earliest Roman geographers heard of Thanet under its earliest
name of Tanet, and because he knew a Greek word Thanatos, which means
death, he so interpreted Thanet. On this absurdity he based a baseless
legend which Lambarde in 1570 thus describes: “There be no snakes in
Tanet (saith he), and the earth that is brought from thence will kill
them.” (Why death to snakes any more than to sheep or shepherds? Why not
go further and make Thanatos a lifeless place like the Dead Sea?) “But
whether he wrote this of any sure understanding that he had of the
quality of the soil, or only by conjecture at the woord Thanatos, which
in Greeke signifieth death, I wote not.” This is as strong an example of
conjectural derivation, with nothing but a superficial resemblance to
support it, as we could find. But Lambarde himself, great as he is in
many ways, gives derivations almost as baseless, _e.g._, Blackheath,
“called of the colour of the soil!” Wrotham, “given for the great
plentie of woorts or good hearbs that growe there.” Farley, “interpreted
the place of the Boares, or Bulles” (which? and why?). Sittingbourne,
“one interprets it Seethingbourne, Rivus Fervens aut Hulliens” (_i.e._,
the boiling or bubbling river—in that flat country!). This is too much
even for him and his times, and so he adds, “but how likely let others
see.”
Our “Tons” and “Stones.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account