RAT-PROOFING AND RAT DESTRUCTION.--While it is frankly admitted that rats may not be completely exterminated by poisoning and trapping, the statement, so frequently repeated of late, that destructive measures really increase their number, is unwarranted and unsustained by facts, at least in Manila. It seems to be the common practice for disbelievers in trapping and poisoning to array the methods of rat-proofing and rat destruction as alternative policies, whereas everyone practically familiar with the work in such cities as Manila--or even in the United States--knows that there is often no choice permitted. Rat-proofing is highly desirable, permanent in its results, and in every respect the "method of election." On the other hand, it is entirely inapplicable at certain times and in certain localities where poverty, lack of interest of property owners, and ofttimes lack of interest and of money on the part of municipalities, absolutely preclude its immediate application. It is therefore unfortunate that the statement, that rat poisoning and trapping are ineffective, either in controlling plague or in reducing the numbers of rats, is circulated. It may be shown easily, by the daily records, that within a few weeks after extensive rat poisoning and trapping (with the breaking up of nests) is pursued in a given locality, the rat catch drops in the most decided manner. Individual premises may be practically cleared of rats by continued intelligent rat catching and poisoning, and while the normal rat birth-rate may keep pace with the normal rat death-rate it will not keep pace with the normal death-rate plus the poisoning and trapping death-rate in any given locality, provided that the poisoning and trapping, with the destruction of nests, be intelligently and continuously carried out. Rat-proofing and rat destruction, then, should not be contrasted as alternative procedures or policies. Both are valuable and each has a proper place. In communities non-infected with plague and unexposed to infection it will probably be found that rat-proofing, carried out in connection with the repairs of old buildings and the erection of new ones, will meet the requirements. On the other hand, in cities exposed to plague infection or already infected, rat destruction is bound to be necessary for years to come. In emergency, the removal of people from intimate relationship with rats (so far as is possible), as practised recently in Tondo district, Manila, will often have to take the place of rat-proofing; and rat destruction and expulsion will be found, in the last analysis, to be the methods upon which success or failure in fighting plague during epidemic time will depend. In this connection I quote correspondence which passed between the Director of Health and myself in 1913. Upon March 22, 1913, I directed the following letter to the Director of Health: