Plague: Its Cause and the Manner of its Extension, Its Menace, Its Control and Suppression, Its Diagnosis and TreatmentJackson, Thomas Wright
History
Plague: Its Cause and the Manner of its Extension, Its Menace, Its Control and Suppression, Its Diagnosis and Treatment
Jackson, Thomas Wright
Plague; Rats as carriers of disease
The phenomenon of agglutination of plague bacilli by the
serum of patients was first observed by Wissokowitsch and
Zabolotny in 1897[8] and later confirmed by the German Plague
Commission. Vagedes, Klein, and others[8] pointed out the
defects of the reaction as a diagnostic means. Aside from
the technical difficulties, the reaction was found
inconstant, and its occurrence was not noticed until the
second week of the disease and even then only in low
dilutions of the serum.
[8] Referred to in Kolle und Wassermann: Handbuch der
pathogenen Mikroorganismen (1903), =2=, 524.
Although the recent work of Strong[9] and of Strong and
Teague[10] has reduced the technical difficulties, the fact
remains that positive agglutination of plague bacilli by the
patient's serum cannot be obtained in the first week of the
disease, and, therefore, the isolation of plague bacilli from
the body of the patient is still the only quick and safe
method of plague diagnosis.
[9] The Philippine Journal of Science, Sec. B. (1907), =2=,
155.
[10] _Ibid._ (1912), =7=, 194-201.
Having utilized the technic devised by Teague, I have had no
difficulty in performing the agglutination test in plague.
The emulsion of plague bacilli, to be used for the test, was
prepared by suspending young cultures of virulent plague
bacilli, grown at 30° C., in salt solution and filtering the
suspension through filter paper. No antiseptic was added nor
heat applied. Serial dilutions of unheated patient's serum
were mixed with equal amounts of bacterial suspension in
small test tubes. Incubation at 35° C. followed. Controls,
consisting of serial dilutions of normal human serum as well
as bacterial suspensions without serum, excluded any possible
error which might have been caused by spontaneous
sedimentation of the bacterial suspension; while a parallel
test with highly agglutinant serum facilitated the reading of
positive results.
Altogether, 22 tests were performed on 15 patients, 11 of
whom were fatal cases and 4 of whom recovered. In the
negative reactions, the duration of the disease at the time
of examination ranges from two to six days. The non-fatal
cases showed slight agglutination from the sixth day on. From
that day, the agglutination titer of the serum was found to
rise, and the agglutinins persisted in the blood of
convalescents up to the seventh week of the disease.[11]
[11] It is hoped that it will be possible to examine some of
the survivors for agglutination from time to time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account