Plato and the Other Companions of Sokrates, 3rd ed. Volume 2 — John Shaqi
Plato and the Other Companions of Sokrates, 3rd ed. Volume 2Grote, George
Philosophy
Plato and the Other Companions of Sokrates, 3rd ed. Volume 2
Grote, George
Philosophy, Ancient; Plato; Socrates, 470 BC-399 BC
Protagoras follows up his mythe by a discourse. Justice and
the sense of shame are not professional attributes, but are possessed
by all citizens and taught by all to all 269
Constant teaching of virtue. Theory of punishment 270
Why eminent men cannot make their sons eminent 271
Teaching by parents, schoolmaster, harpist, laws,
dikastery, &c. _ib._
All learn virtue from the same teaching by all. Whether a
learner shall acquire more or less of it, depends upon his own
individual aptitude 272
Analogy of learning vernacular Greek. No special teacher
thereof. Protagoras teaches virtue somewhat better than others 273
The sons of great artists do not themselves become great
artists 274
Remarks upon the mythe and discourse. They explain the
manner in which the established sentiment of a community propagates
and perpetuates itself 274
Antithesis of Protagoras and Sokrates. Whether virtue is
to be assimilated to a special art 275
Procedure of Sokrates in regard to the discourse of
Protagoras--he compliments it as an exposition, and analyses some of
the fundamental assumptions 276
One purpose of the dialogue. To contrast continuous
discourse with short cross-examining question and answer 277
Questions by Sokrates--Whether virtue is one and
indivisible, or composed of different parts? Whether the parts are
homogeneous or heterogeneous? _ib._
Whether justice is just, and holiness holy? How far
justice is like to holiness? Sokrates protests against an answer, "If
you please" 278
Intelligence and moderation are identical, because they
have the same contrary 279
Insufficient reasons given by Sokrates. He seldom cares to
distinguish different meanings of the same term _ib._
Protagoras is puzzled, and becomes irritated 280
Sokrates presses Protagoras farther. His purpose is, to
test opinions and not persons. Protagoras answers with angry
prolixity _ib._
Remonstrance of Sokrates against long answers as
inconsistent with the laws of dialogue. Protagoras persists. Sokrates
rises to depart 281
Interference of Kallias to get the debate continued.
Promiscuous conversation. Alkibiades declares that Protagoras ought
to acknowledge superiority of Sokrates in dialogue 282
Claim of a special _locus standi_ and professorship
for Dialectic, apart from Rhetoric _ib._
Sokrates is prevailed upon to continue, and invites
Protagoras to question him _ib._
Protagoras extols the importance of knowing the works of
the poets, and questions about parts of a song of Simonides.
Dissenting opinions about the interpretation of the song 283
Long speech of Sokrates, expounding the purpose of the
song, and laying down an ironical theory about the numerous concealed
sophists at Krete and Sparta, masters of short speech 283
Character of this speech--its connection with the
dialogue, and its general purpose. Sokrates inferior to Protagoras in
continuous speech 284
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account