Playwrights on playmaking : $b and other studies of the stageMatthews, Brander
History
Playwrights on playmaking : $b and other studies of the stage
Matthews, Brander
Drama -- History and criticism; Theater
III _Old Plays and New Playgoers_ 37
IV _Tragedies with Happy Endings_ 57
V _On the Advantage of Having a Pattern_ 79
VI _Did Shakspere Write Plays to Fit His Actors?_ 97
VII _Strange Shaksperian Performances_ 119
VIII _Thackeray and the Theater_ 137
IX _Mark Twain and the Theater_ 159
X _Henry James and the Theater_ 185
XI _Stage Humor_ 205
XII _The “Old Comedies”_ 227
XIII _The Organization of the Theater_ 245
XIV _Memories of Actors_ 281
I
PLAYWRIGHTS ON PLAYMAKING
I
PLAYWRIGHTS ON PLAYMAKING
I
We have no right to expect that a creator of art should be also a
critic of art. He is a creator because he can create, because he
can paint a picture, model a statue, tell a story in action on the
stage or delineate character in narrative; and he needs only enough
of the critical faculty to enable him to achieve the obligatory
self-criticism, without which he may go astray. If he is a born
story-teller, for instance, he may tell stories by native gift,
almost without taking thought as to how he does it; and even if he
does it very well, he may be an artist in spite of himself, so to
speak. He may achieve his effects without analyzing his processes,
perhaps without understanding them or even perceiving them. His
methods are intuitive rather than rational; they are personal to him;
and he cannot impart them to others.
He may in fact misconceive his own effort and see himself in a false
light, sincerely believing that he is doing his work in one way
when he is really doing it in another. Zola, for one, was entirely
at fault in the opinion he held about his own novels; he was so
uncritical that he supposed himself to be a Realist, avid of facts,
whereas he was unmistakably a Romanticist, planning epic edifices
symmetrical and fantastic and forcing the facts he diligently
sought for to fit as best they could into the structure of the
dream-dwelling he was building. Zola was a tireless worker dowered
with constructive imagination, but he was not more intelligent than
the average man; and he was distinctly deficient in critical insight,
as was swiftly disclosed when he ventured to discuss the principles
of novel-writing and the practices of his fellow-craftsmen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account