Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 3: In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four PeriodsPlotinus
Philosophy
Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 3: In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods
Plotinus
Plotinus
[50] As thought the Stoics.
[51] Like Aristotle, de Sensu et Sensili, 2.
[52] iv. 5.
[53] These ten disjointed reflections on happiness remind us of
Porphyry's questioning habit, without which, Plotinos said, he might
have had nothing to write; see Biography, 13.
[54] As Epicurus thought the divinities alone enjoyed perfect
happiness, Diog. Laert. x. 121.
[55] See Aristotle, Nic. Ethics, 1.10.
[56] See Cicero, de Finibus, ii. 27-29.
[57] See iii. 7.
[58] Plutarch, Dogm. Philos. i. 17; Stob. Eclog. i. 18.
[59] Arist. Topic. iv. 2; de Gener. et Cor. i. 10; Ravaisson, EMA, i.
422.
[60] As did Alexander of Aphrodisias, in his treatise on "Mixture;"
Ravaisson, EMA, ii. 297.
[61] Stob. Eclog. i. 18.
[62] See Plutarch, "Whether Wickedness Renders One Unhappy."
[63] As said Numenius, 44.
[64] See vi. 7. This is another proof of the chronological order, as
vi. 7 follows this book.
[65] Bouillet explains that in this book Plotinos summated all that
Plato had to say of the Ideas and of their dependence on the Good, in
the Timaeus, Philebus, Phaedrus, the Republic, the Banquet, and the
Alcibiades; correcting this summary by the reflections of Aristotle,
in Met. xii. But Plotinos advances beyond both Plato and Aristotle in
going beyond Intelligence to the supreme Good. (See Sec. 37.) This
treatise might well have been written at the instigation of Porphyry,
who desired to understand Plotinos's views on this great subject.
[66] The famous Philonic distinction between "ho theos," and "theos."
[67] Plato, Timaeus, p. 45, Cary, 19.
[68] See iii. 2.
[69] See iii. 2.1.
[70] Plato's Timaeus, pp. 30-40, Cary, 10-15.
[71] An Aristotelian idea, from Met. vii. 1.
[72] Aristotle, Met. vii. 17.
[73] Met. vii. 1.
[74] Met. vii. 7.
[75] Aristotle, Met. v. 8.
[76] Met. 1.3.
[77] See ii. 9.3.
[78] Aristotle, de Anima, ii. 2; Met. vii. 17.
[79] Porphyry, Of the Faculties of the Soul, fr. 5.
[80] See ii. 5.3.
[81] Aristotle, de Anima, i. 3; ii. 2-4.
[82] Plato, I Alcibiades, p. 130, Cary, 52.
[83] See i. 1.3.
[84] Bouillet explains this as follows: Discursive reason, which
constitutes the real man, begets sensibility, which constitutes the
animal; see i. 1.7.
[85] See iii. 4.3-6.
[86] See iii. 4.6.
[87] These demons are higher powers of the human soul.
[88] See iv. 3.18.
[89] Plato, Timaeus, p. 76, Cary, 54.
[90] p. 39, Cary, 15.
[91] Plato, Timaeus, p. 77, Cary, 55.
[92] See iv. 4.22.
[93] Lucretius, v. 1095.
[94] Diogenes Laertes, iii. 74.
[95] Plato, Timaeus, p. 80, Cary, 61.
[96] See iv. 3.18.
[97] Plato, Phaedrus, p. 248, Cary, 60; see i. 3.4.
[98] See v. 7.
[99] See v. 1.9.
[100] See i. 8.6, 7.
[101] Rep. vi. p. 509, Cary, 19.
[102] See v. 1.7.
[103] See v. 1.5.
[104] See v. 1.7.
[105] Plato, Rep. vi. p. 509, Cary, 19.
[106] See v. 1.6.
[107] See iv. 8.3.
[108] See v. 1.4.
[109] See v. 1.6.
[110] Arist. Nic. Eth. 1.1.
[111] See Arist., Met. i. 5.
[112] According to Plato's Banquet, p. 206, Cary, 31.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account