Ploughshare and Pruning-Hook: Ten Lectures on Social Subjects — John Shaqi
Ploughshare and Pruning-Hook: Ten Lectures on Social SubjectsHousman, Laurence
Philosophy
Ploughshare and Pruning-Hook: Ten Lectures on Social Subjects
Housman, Laurence
Social ethics; Social sciences
But this vengeful exercise of parental authority is only a secondary
symptom of belief in a vengeful order of Creation--of a God whose
method it was to vindicate the moral law, not by bringing home to
ill-doers through natural consequences the defects of certain courses
of conduct, but by expressing His moral indignation in exemplary
punishments of an arbitrary kind--generally of a miraculous character.
When man first conceived of God, he conceived of Him as a sort of Dr.
Busby--one in whose mind the Rod was the beginning and end of wisdom;
and the Rod of Heaven operated by intervention, over and above the
operations of Nature--the law of cause and effect. Natural consequences
did not sufficiently vindicate divine justice. A belief in miraculous
and vengeful intervention and a belief in “exemplary” legal punishment
go together; and will, I believe, die together.
A great deal of Old Testament teaching is merely an elaborate extension
of _Punch’s_ picture of the British workman holding a brick’s end over
an unfortunate batrachian, and saying, “I’ll l’arn ye to be a toad!”
And all he succeeds in doing is producing a dead toad instead of a live
one; the species itself remaining entirely unaltered.
That is a parable of the doings of our theologians, since theology was
invented for the Fall of Man. And if humans came to the conclusion that
that was the mind of God, it is no wonder that they imitated Him, and
do so to this day.
We must believe in punishment as the proper reward of crime--we must
even believe in unreformative punishment as the proper reward of crime,
if we believe in a Hell to which lost souls are relegated against their
will, and there kept with no hope whatever of cure or betterment from
the process. And that is what the whole of Christendom believed about
Hell when Christians really did believe in it.
Unreformative punishment upon earth was a necessary consequence of that
belief; and, therefore, belief in punishment for the sake of punishment
became universal.
And over against it--quite unregarded--stood the new gospel of
humanity--“Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to
them that hate you, pray for them which despitefully use you and
persecute you.” And then the reason, the key to it all:--“That ye may
be children of your Father which is in Heaven, for He maketh His sun to
rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on
the unjust. Be ye, therefore, perfect, even as your Father which is in
Heaven is perfect.”
The Sermon on the Mount, which threw over the doctrine of punishment
on earth, threw over with equal emphasis the doctrine of punishment in
Heaven--of any arbitrary or miraculous intervention for the betterment
(to moral ends) of the law of natural consequences.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account