Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"Plutarch
Philosophy
Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"
Plutarch
Classical literature; Essays; Ethics; Philosophy
31. And yet they are never wearied with their brawling and dunning
of all persons to take the escape of evil for a good, and yet not to
repute privation of good for an evil. But they still confess what
we have asserted, that death hath in it nothing of either good hope
or solace, but that all that is complacent and good is then wholly
extinguished; at which time those men look for many amiable, great, and
divine things, that conceive the minds of men to be unperishable and
immortal, or at least to go about in certain long revolutions of times,
being one while upon earth and another while in heaven, until they are
at last dissolved with the universe and then, together with the sun
and moon, sublimed into an intellective fire. So large a field and one
of so great pleasures Epicurus wholly cuts off, when he destroys (as
hath been said) the hopes and graces we should derive from the Gods,
and by that extinguishes both in our speculative capacity the desire of
knowledge, and in our active the love of glory, and confines and abases
our nature to a poor narrow thing, and that not cleanly neither, to
wit, the content the mind receives by the body, as if it were capable
of no higher good than the escape of evil.
ROMAN QUESTIONS.
_Question 1._ Wherefore do the Romans require a new-married woman
to touch fire and water?
_Solution._ Is it not for one of these reasons; amongst elements
and principles, one is masculine and the other feminine;—one (fire)
hath in it the principles of motion, the other (water) hath the faculty
of a subject and matter? Or is it because fire refines and water
cleanseth, and a married wife ought to continue pure and chaste? Or is
it because fire without moisture doth not nourish, but is adust, and
water destitute of heat is barren and sluggish; so both the male and
female apart are of no force, but a conjunction of both in marriage
completes society? Or is the meaning that they must never forsake each
other, but must communicate in every fortune, and although there be no
goods, yet they may participate with each other in fire and water?
_Question 2._ Why do they light at nuptials five torches, neither
more nor less, which they call waxen tapers?
_Solution._ Whether it be (as Varro saith) that the Praetors use
three, but more are permitted to the Aediles, and married persons do
light the fire at the Aediles’ torches? Or is it that, having use of
many numbers, the odd number was reckoned better and perfecter upon
other accounts, and therefore more adapted to matrimony? For the even
number admits of division, and the equal parts of opposition and
repugnancy, whenas the odd cannot be divided, but being divided into
parts leaves always an inequality. The number five is most matrimonial
of odd numbers, for three is the first odd and two is the first even,
of which five is compounded, as of male and female.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account