Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"Plutarch
Philosophy
Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"
Plutarch
Classical literature; Essays; Ethics; Philosophy
_Solution._ What if this be not true, but the dialect deludes
so many? For they render ἀριστερόν _sinistrum_; but to permit a
thing is _sinere_, and they say _sine_ when they desire a
thing to be permitted; therefore a prognostic permitting an action
(being _sinisterium_) the vulgar do understand and call amiss
_sinistrum_. Or is it as Dionysius saith, that when Ascanius,
the son of Aeneas, had pitched battle against Mezentius, a flash of
lightning portending victory (as they prognosticated) came on his
left hand, and for the future they observed it so; or, as some others
say, that this happened to Aeneas? Moreover, the Thebans routing and
conquering their enemies by the left wing of the army at Leuctra, they
continued in all battles to give the left wing the pre-eminence. Or is
it rather as Juba thinks, that to those that look toward the east the
north is on the left hand, which verily some make the right hand and
superior part of the world? Consider whether the soothsayers do not,
as it were, corroborate left-hand things, as the weaker by nature,
and do intimate as if they introduced a supply of that defect of power
that is in them. Or is it that they think that things terrestrial and
mortal stand directly over against heavenly and divine things, and do
conjecture that the things which to us are on the left hand the Gods
send down from their right hand?
_Question 79._ Why was it lawful to bring the bones of one that
had triumphed (after he was dead and burnt) into the city and lay them
there, as Pyrrho the Liparaean hath told us?
_Solution._ Was it for the honor they had for the deceased? For
they granted that not only generals and other eminent persons, but also
their offspring, should be buried in the market-place, for example,
Valerius and Fabricius. And they say, when the posterity of these
persons died, they were brought into the market-place, and a burning
firebrand was put under them and immediately taken away; and thus all
that might have caused envy was avoided, and the right to the honor was
fully confirmed.
_Question 80._ Why did they that publicly feasted the triumphers
humbly request the consuls, and by messengers sent beseech them, not to
come to their supper?
_Solution._ Was it that it was necessary to give the supreme place
and most honorable entertainment to the triumpher, and wait upon him
home after supper; whereas, the consuls being present, they might do
such things to none other but them?
_Question 81._ Why did not the tribune of the people wear a purple
garment, whenas each of the other magistrates wore one?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account