Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 3 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"Plutarch
Philosophy
Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 3 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"
Plutarch
Classical literature; Essays; Ethics; Philosophy
These that I have mentioned are very different in taste, smell, and
other qualities, and he reckons more sorts which I have omitted. The
second Homer skilfully refutes, when he tells us that the plague
first began amongst the beasts. Besides, the shortness of their lives
proves that they are very subject to diseases; for there is scarce any
irrational creature long lived, besides the crow and the chough; and
those two every one knows do not confine themselves to simple food, but
eat any thing. Besides, you take no good rule to judge what is easy and
what is hard of digestion from the diet of those that are sick; for
labor and exercise, and even to chew our meat well, contribute very
much to digestion, neither of which can agree with a man in a fever.
Again, that the variety of meats, by reason of the different qualities
of the particulars, should disagree and spoil one another, you have no
reason to fear. For if Nature chooses from dissimilar bodies what is
fit and agreeable, the diverse nourishment transmits many and sundry
qualities into the mass and bulk of the body, applying to every part
that which is meet and fit; so that, as Empedocles words it,
The sweet runs to the sweet, the sour combines
With sour, the sharp with sharp, the hot with hot;
and after the mixture is spread through the mass by the heat which
is in the spirit, the proper parts are separated and applied to the
proper members. Indeed, it is very probable that such bodies as ours,
consisting of parts of different natures, should be nourished and built
up rather of various than of simple matter. But if by concoction there
is an alteration made in the food, this will be more easily performed
when there are different sorts of meat, than when there is only one,
in the stomach; for similars cannot work upon similars, and the very
contrariety in the mixture considerably promotes the alteration of the
enfeebled qualities. But if, Philinus, you are against all mixture,
do not chide Philo only for the variety of his dishes and sauces, but
also for using mixture in his sovereign antidotes, which Erasistratus
calls the Gods’ hands. Convince him of absurdity and vanity, when he
mixes things vegetable, mineral, and animal, and things from sea and
land, in one potion; and advise him to let these alone, and to confine
all physic to barley-broth, gourds, and oil mixed with water. But you
urge farther, that variety enticeth the appetite that hath no command
over itself. That is, good sir, cleanly, wholesome, sweet, palatable,
pleasing diet makes us eat and drink more than ordinary. Why then,
instead of fine flour, do not we thicken our broth with coarse bran?
And instead of asparagus, why do we not dress nettle-tops and thistles;
and leaving this fragrant and pleasant wine, drink sour harsh liquor
that gnats have been buzzing about along while? Because, perhaps you
may reply, wholesome feeding doth not consist in a perfect avoiding of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account