Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 3 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"Plutarch
Philosophy
Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 3 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"
Plutarch
Classical literature; Essays; Ethics; Philosophy
2. Florus bade us not mind the Egyptians, but speak according to the
Grecian custom on the present subject. But I replied: The Egyptians
are not contrary to the Greeks in this matter; for the profession of
purity and chastity forbids getting children, laughter, wine, and many
other very commendable and lawful things; and perhaps such votaries
avoid salt, as being, according to some men’s opinions, by its heat
provocative and apt to raise lust. Or they refuse it as the most
pleasant of all sauces, for indeed salt may be called the sauce of all
sauces; and therefore some call salt χάριτας; because it makes food,
which is necessary for life, to be relishing and pleasant.
3. What then, said Florus, shall we say that salt is termed divine
for that reason? Indeed that is very considerable, for men for the
most part deify those common things that are exceeding useful to their
necessities and wants, as water, light, the seasons of the year; and
the earth they do not only think to be divine, but a very God. Now salt
is as useful as either of these, being a sort of protector to the food
as it comes into the body, and making it palatable and agreeable to the
appetite. But consider farther, whether its power of preserving dead
bodies from rotting a long time be not a divine property, and opposite
to death; since it preserves part, and will not suffer that which is
mortal wholly to be destroyed. But as the soul, which is our diviner
part, connects the limbs of animals, and keeps the composure from
dissolution; thus salt applied to dead bodies, and imitating the work
of the soul, stops those parts that were falling to corruption, binds
and confines them, and so makes them keep their union and agreement
with one another. And therefore some of the Stoics say, that swine’s
flesh then deserves the name of a body, when the soul like salt spreads
through it and keeps the parts from dissolution. Besides, you know that
we account lightning to be sacred and divine, because the bodies that
are thunder-struck do not rot for a long time; what wonder is it then,
that the ancients called salt as well as lightning divine, since it
hath the same property and power?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account