Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 5 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"Plutarch
Philosophy
Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 5 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"
Plutarch
Classical literature; Essays; Ethics; Philosophy
AUTOBULUS. Why truly, Soclarus, this is not a thing that seems so
absurd to those men. For that while they assert the extreme love of
parents towards their children to be the principle of society and
justice, and find at the same time this virtue apparent and surpassing
in brute animals, yet they will not allow them in the least to partake
of justice; like mules, which, though they are furnished with genital
parts, as wanting neither privities nor wombs, and mixing with delight
and pleasure, yet cannot attain the end of generation. But then again
I would have you consider, whether they be not ridiculous, that affirm
Socrates or Plato to be no less vicious than the meanest of slaves,—nay
more, that they were fools, intemperate, and unjust,—and then find
fault with the nature of beasts, as being impure and no way accurately
framed for the reception of virtue; as if this were proof of utter
want of reason, and not of depravedness and imbecility of reason.
And all the while, they acknowledge that there are vices of reason,
of which all brute beasts are guilty; many of which we plainly find
to be intemperate, fearful, malicious, and unjust. Therefore he that
denies that reason exists by Nature in a creature, because it is not
framed by Nature to attain to the perfection of reason, little differs
from one that should deny a monkey to partake of deformity by Nature,
or a tortoise of slowness, as being neither susceptible of beauty or
swiftness. Nor do they observe the distinction that lies before their
eyes. For reason is in the creature by Nature, but right and perfect
reason is attained by industry and education; so that naturally all
creatures may be said to be rational. But if they look for perfection
of reason and true wisdom, they will hardly find those perfections
in any man whatever. For as there is a difference between sight and
sight, and between flight and flight,—for hawks and grasshoppers
do not see alike, neither do eagles and partridges fly with equal
swiftness,—so neither in all rational creatures is there to be found
the same perfection of cunning and acuteness. For as there are many
examples to be produced of several brute creatures, excelling in the
observance of society, fortitude, and foresight as to their particular
economy and making provision for themselves; so on the other side,
there may be found among them as many of injustice, cowardice, and
folly. Which is evident from the present contest wherein these young
gentlemen have engaged themselves, while the one has undertaken to
maintain that land-animals, the other that creatures bred in the
sea, are most inclined to virtue. Which is plainly demonstrated by
comparing river-horses with storks. For the one support and cherish
their fathers, the others kill them that they may enjoy their dams. So
likewise, if you compare doves with partridges. For the cock partridge
will not suffer the hen to sit, but breaks her eggs and throws them
out of the nest if she refuses to be trod.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account