Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 5 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"Plutarch
Philosophy
Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 5 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"
Plutarch
Classical literature; Essays; Ethics; Philosophy
If it were then true that the moon, being, as the Stoics say, a muddy
and troubled star, has a weak and duskish fire, it would be meet that
she should suffer none of these accidents which she is now seen to
suffer, but altogether the contrary; to wit, that she should be seen
when she is hidden, and absconded when she appears; that is, she should
be concealed all the rest of the time, being obscured by the environing
air, and again shine forth and become apparent and manifest for six
months together, and afterwards disappear again five months, entering
into the shadow of the earth. For of four hundred and sixty-five
revolutions of ecliptic full moons, four hundred and four are of six
months’ duration, and the rest of five. The moon then should all this
time appear shining in the shadow; but on the contrary we see, that in
the shadow she is eclipsed and loses her light, and recovers it again
after she is escaped and got forth of the shadow. Nay, she appears
often in the daytime, so that she is rather any thing else than a fiery
and starry body.
21. As soon as Lucius had said these things, Pharnaces and Apollonides
ran both together upon him, to oppugn and refute his discourse; and
then Apollonides giving him way, Pharnaces said: This it is that
principally shows the moon to be a star and of a fiery nature, that in
her eclipses she is not wholly obscured and disappearing, but shows
herself with a certain coal-resembling color, terrible to the sight,
yet such as is proper to her.
As for Apollonides, he insisted much in opposition to the word shadow,
saying, that the mathematicians always give that name to the place
which is not enlightened, and that heaven admits no shadow.
To this I thus answered: This instance is rather alleged obstinately
against the name, than naturally or mathematically against the thing.
For if one will not call the place obfuscated by the opposition of
the earth a shadow, but a place deprived of light, yet be it what
it will, you must of necessity confess that the moon being there
becomes obscure; and every way, said I, it is a folly to deny that
the shadow of the earth reaches thither from whence the shadow of the
moon, falling upon our sight here on earth, causes the eclipse of the
sun. And therefore I now address myself to you, Pharnaces; for this
coal-like and burnt color of the moon, which you affirm to be proper
to her, belongs to a body that has thickness and depth. For there is
not wont to remain any relic, mark, or print of flame in a body that
is rare, nor can a coal be made where there is not a solid body which
may receive into it the heat of the fire; as Homer himself shows in a
certain passage, where he says,
Then, when the languid flames at length subside,
He strows a bed of glowing embers wide.[99]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account