Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 5 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"Plutarch
Philosophy
Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 5 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"
Plutarch
Classical literature; Essays; Ethics; Philosophy
22. Therefore it was the opinion of the ancient philosophers and
learned men, that terrestrial and celestial things were not to be mixed
together, not so much out of a local consideration of uppermost and
lowermost, in respect of place, but with a respect to the difference
of faculties attributing hot and splendent, swift and light to the
immortal and sempiternal Nature, but believing dark and cold and slow
to be the unhappy portion of the dead under the shackles of corruption.
Since the body of a living creature, while it breathes and flourishes
(as the poets say), enjoys both heat and life; but being deprived of
these, and only the terrestrial parts remaining, presently cold and
stiffness take place, as if heat were naturally existent in every thing
else but only the earth.
23. These things, dear Favorinus, compare with what has been said by
others; and if they neither come too short of probability nor too much
exceed it, bid all their opinions farewell, as believing it much more
becoming a philosopher to pause in dubious matters, rather than over
hastily to side with any one particular party.
WHETHER WATER OR FIRE BE MOST USEFUL.
1. “Water is the best of things, but gold is like burning fire,” says
Pindar[123]. Therefore he positively assigns the second place to fire;
with whom Hesiod agrees, where he says,
First of all Chaos being had.[124]
For most believe that by the word chaos he meant water, from χύσις,
signifying _diffusion_. But the balance of argument as to this point
seems to be equal. For there are some who will have it that fire is the
principle of all things, and that like sperm it begets all things out
of itself, and resolves all things again by conflagration. Therefore,
not to mention the persons, let us consider the arguments on both
sides, which are to us the most convincing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account