Greece -- Biography -- Early works to 1800; Rome -- Biography -- Early works to 1800
final vengeance on Antonius.
COMPARISON OF DEMOSTHENES AND CICERO.
I. The above is all I have been able to find out that is worth being
recorded about Demosthenes and Cicero. Without attempting to compare
their different styles of oratory, I think it necessary to remark that
Demosthenes devoted all his powers, natural and acquired, to the study
of eloquence alone, so that he surpassed all his rivals in the law
courts and public assembly in perspicuity and ability, all the writers
of declamations in splendour and pomp of diction, and all the
professional sophists in accuracy and scientific method. Cicero, on the
other hand, was a man of great learning and various literary
accomplishments. He wrote a considerable number of philosophic treatises
modelled on the works of the Academic school, and in all his forensic
and political speeches we can detect a desire to let his audience know
that he was a man of letters. In their speeches, too, we can discern the
impress of their respective characters. The eloquence of Demosthenes
never stoops to jest, and is utterly without ornament, but has a
terrible concentrated earnestness, which does not smell of the lamp, as
Pytheas sneeringly said, but which reminds us of the ungenial,
painstaking, acrimonious nature of the man: while Cicero often is
carried by his love of jesting to the verge of buffoonery, and in his
pleadings treats serious matters in a tone of most unbecoming levity and
flippancy, as in the oration for Cæcilius he argues that in an age of
such luxury and extravagance there can be nothing to wonder at if a man
takes his pleasure; for not to help oneself to the pleasures which are
within one's reach is the part of a madman, seeing that the most eminent
philosophers have declared the chief felicity of man to consist in
pleasure. It is related that when Cato prosecuted Murena, Cicero, who
was consul at the time, defended him, and cracked many jokes on Cato as
an adherent of the Stoic philosophy, and on the absurdity of the
paradoxes which it maintains. The audience, and even the judges, laughed
heartily; but Cato merely remarked to those near him, with a quiet
smile, "Gentlemen, what a witty consul we have." Cicero, indeed, seems
to have been fond of laughter and mirth, and his countenance was calm
and smiling; while that of Demosthenes always bore the marks of gloomy,
anxious thought, which caused his enemies, as he himself tells us, to
call him disagreeable and ill-natured.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account