Greece -- Biography -- Early works to 1800; Rome -- Biography -- Early works to 1800
II. In their speeches we may observe that Demosthenes praises himself
with great moderation, in a manner which can offend no one, and only
when he has some more important object in view, while he is usually
modest and cautious in his language; whereas Cicero's show a ridiculous
amount of egotism and craving for applause, when, he demands that "arms
shall yield to the toga, and the triumphal laurel[290] give place to his
tongue." At last he took to praising not only his own deeds, but even
his spoken and written[291] orations, as though he were engaged in some
contest with professional rhetoricians like Isokrates or Anaximenes,
rather than endeavouring to lead and reform the Roman people--
"Savage and rude, whose sole delight
Was with their foes to strive in fight."
A politician must of necessity be a powerful speaker, but it is a
contemptible thing for him to be too greedy and covetous of applause for
his fine speeches. Wherefore, in this respect Demosthenes appears far
graver, and of a nobler nature; for he himself declared that his
eloquence came only by practice, and depended on the favour of his
audience, and that he regarded those who boasted of their oratorical
powers as vulgar and despicable characters.
III. They were both alike in their power and influence with the people,
which caused even the commanders of armies in the field to look to them
for support; for Demosthenes was courted by Chares, Diopeithes, and
Leosthenes, as was Cicero by Pompeius and the younger Cæsar,[292] as
Cæsar himself admits in his memoirs addressed to Mæcenas and Agrippa. We
cannot judge of Demosthenes by that which is said to afford the most
certain test of a man's true character--his conduct when in power--for he
has not afforded us any opportunity of doing so, as he would not even
take the command of the confederacy which he himself organised to oppose
Philip. Now Cicero was sent to Sicily as quæstor, and to Cilicia and
Cappadocia as proconsul, at a period when the love of wealth was at its
height, and when the Roman generals and governors, thinking it beneath
them to steal money, used to resort to open robbery. It was not thought
discreditable to plunder a province, but he who did so with moderation
was esteemed as an excellent governor. Cicero on these occasions gained
great credit by the many proofs which he gave of indifference to money,
and of goodness and kindness of heart. At Rome itself also, he was
elected nominally consul, but really dictator with unlimited powers to
deal with Catilina's conspiracy, and he then proved the truth of Plato's
aphorism, that a state finds rest from its misfortunes when by good luck
a powerful and able man is found to rule it with justice. Demosthenes
again is said to have made money dishonourably by writing speeches for
other men, as in the case of the speeches with which he secretly
furnished Phormio and Apollodorus, when they were opposed to one
another.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account