Greece -- Biography -- Early works to 1800; Rome -- Biography -- Early works to 1800
XIII. I cannot, therefore, understand what Theopompus meant by saying
that he was of an inconstant disposition, and not able to remain long
associated with any party or any line of policy. It appears rather that
he remained throughout the consistent advocate of the same principles,
and a member of the same political party to which he originally
belonged, and that he not only never changed his politics in his life,
but even lost his life because he would not change them. He was not like
Demades, who to excuse himself for changing sides pleaded that he had
oftentimes gone against his own words, but never against the interests
of the state. Still less can he be compared with Melanopus, the
political opponent of Kallistratus, who was often bribed by him to allow
some measure to pass, and on these occasions would say to the people,
"The man is my personal enemy, but I postpone my personal feelings to
the good of my country." Nikodemus of Messene, who first took up with
Kassander, and afterwards became the advocate of Demetrius, used to
declare that he never was inconsistent, because it was always best to
obey the strongest party. But in the case of Demosthenes, unlike these
men, we can say that he never deviated either in word or deed from the
one direct line of policy which he unswervingly pursued to the end. The
philosopher Panætius declares that in most of his orations, as in that
about the Crown, that against Aristokrates, that on behalf of the
persons exempted from taxation (against Leptines), and in the
Philippics, we can trace the principle that honour ought to be pursued
for its own sake; for in all these he urges his countrymen not to adopt
the most pleasant, the most easy, or the most profitable line of policy,
but often thinks that caution and even safety should be regarded as of
less importance than honourable conduct; so that if to his noble
principles and high-minded eloquence he had joined warlike courage and
clean hands from bribery, he would have been worthy to rank, not with
Moerokles, Polyeuktus, and Hypereides, but with Kimon, Thucydides,
Perikles, and other great men of old.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account