Plutarch's Romane Questions: With dissertations on Italian cults, myths, taboos, man-worship, aryan marriage, sympathetic magic and the eating of beansPlutarch
Religion
Plutarch's Romane Questions: With dissertations on Italian cults, myths, taboos, man-worship, aryan marriage, sympathetic magic and the eating of beans
Plutarch
Rome -- Religion -- Early works to 1800; Rome -- Social life and customs -- Early works to 1800
[20] Preller, _R. M._, i. 1 and 2, points out that Italian mythology is
"quite different" from the Greek; that it is only in "a certain
sense" that there can be said to be a Roman mythology; that it is a
very different thing from Greek, Hindoo, Persian, Teutonic, and
Scandinavian mythology; that the Romans had not advanced far in
personifying and individualising their gods, and consequently could
not develop much mythology. Finally, Italian religion was "far less
widely removed" from the primitive Aryan belief than Greek religion
and mythology were.
[21] Livy, ii. 21; Dion., vi. i.
[22] Mommsen, _Hist. of Rome_, i. 482 _ff._
[23] According to Schwegler, _Röm. Gesch._, i. 354-383, Εὔανδρος is simply
Greek for _Faunus_ = _Favinus_, "the benevolent" or "good" god. _Cf._
Fauna = Bona Dea.
[24] "Rapi ... similatur virgo ex gremio matris ... cum ad virum trahitur,
quod videlicet ea res feliciter Romulo cessit."—Festus, s.v. _rapi_.
[25] _E.g._, among the Esthonians, Finns, Wotjaks, Mordwins, Vedic
Hindoos, and Bohemians.
[26] For the use of the sword, axe, or dagger to keep off evil spirits
from a wedding, see Schroeder, _Hochzeitsbräuche der Ester_, 99-102.
[27] For the sacredness of the head especially, see the _Golden Bough_, i.
187-193.
[28] The myth, as given by Plutarch, is to be found also in Livy, i. 9;
Serv. ad Æn., vi. 55; and in Varro, quoted by Festus, p. 351. The
word occurs in Martial, i. 35. 6 and 7; iii. 93. 25; xii. 42. 4, 95.
5 (Friedländer says nothing), and Catullus, lxi. 134 (Robinson Ellis
has nothing to say).
[29] Hartley, _Science of Fairy Tales_, pp. 279-281, for examples. The
tale of Servius is also told by Ovid, _F._, vi. 577.
[30] It is interesting to note that two hundred years ago Boxhorn, in
commenting on this passage of Plutarch, laid down a fundamental
proposition of the science of folk-lore:—"Mortales cum inquirerent in
caussas rerum, nec invenirent, pro libitu suo verisimiles sunt
commenti. Sic ut fabulæ proponerentur tanquam caussæ rerum, cum res
ipsæ essent causeæ fabularum." See his edition of the _Roman
Questions_, printed in vol. v. of the _Thesaurus_ of Grævius (Lugd.,
Batavor, 1696).
[31] _Ethnology in Folk-Lore_, pp. 120 _ff._ Mr. Gomme, however, argues
that the fear of dead kindred was borrowed by the Aryans from the
non-Aryan inhabitants of Europe. But why may not the pro-ethnic
Aryans, as well as other savages, have had, at one stage of their
development, a fear of dead kindred?
[32] My authorities for the customs quoted in the next few pages are
(unless special references are given) Wuttke, _Deutsche
Volksaberglaube_, §§ 725-756; Rochholz, _Deutscher Glaube und
Brauch_, ii. pp. 170-173; and De Rialle, _Mythologie Comparée_, i. p.
125.
[33] Weinhold, _Altnord. Leben_, 476.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account