Poetic diction: A study of eighteenth century verseQuayle, Thomas
History
Poetic diction: A study of eighteenth century verse
Quayle, Thomas
English language -- Diction; English poetry -- 18th century -- History and criticism
Wordsworth, in launching his famous declaration of principle on the
language fit and proper for metrical composition, had no doubt especially
in mind the practice of his eighteenth century predecessors. But it has
to be remembered that the _Prefaces_ deal in reality with the whole
genesis of “what is usually called poetic diction,” and that the avowed
aim and object was to sweep away “a large portion of phrases and figures
of speech, which from father to son have long been regarded as the common
inheritance of poets.” The circumstances of the time, and perhaps the
examples chosen by Wordsworth to illustrate his thesis, have too often
led to his attack being considered as concerned almost entirely with the
poetical language of the eighteenth century. Hence, whenever the phrase
“poetic diction” is mentioned as a term of English literary history,
more often than not it is to the eighteenth century that the attention
is directed, and the phrase itself has taken on a derogatory tinge,
expressive of a stereotyped language, imitative, mechanical, lifeless.
For in the reaction against eighteenth century styles, and especially
against the polished heroic couplet, there arose a tendency to make the
diction of the period an object of undistinguishing depreciation, to
class it all in one category, as a collection of conventional words and
phrases of which all poets and versifiers felt themselves at liberty to
make use.
An actual analysis of eighteenth century poetry shows us that this
criticism is both deficient and misleading; it is misleading because it
neglects to take any account of that eighteenth century poetical language
which Pope, inheriting it from Dryden, brought to perfection, and which
was so admirable a vehicle for the satiric or didactic thought it had to
convey; it is deficient in that it concentrates attention mainly on one
type or variety of the language, used both by poets and poetasters, and
persists in labelling this type either as the “eighteenth century style
proper,” or, as if the phrases were synonymous, “the Pope style.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account