Poine: a study in ancient Greek blood-vengeanceTreston, Hubert Joseph
History
Poine: a study in ancient Greek blood-vengeance
Treston, Hubert Joseph
Criminal law (Greek law); Greece -- Civilization; Greek drama (Tragedy) -- History and criticism; Homicide (Greek law); Vendetta
Having now set forth the most important features of the
homicide-judicature of Athens in the fourth century B.C., it remains
to inquire what inferences may be drawn from these features as to the
origin and the evolution of these courts. Our views as to the general
origin of the Attic courts have already been indicated.[98] The theory
of Gilbert and of Köhler that these courts originated in the right of
sanctuary we have rejected as improbable.[99] The court at Phreatto had
no connexion with a temple. Neither had the Prytaneum. The temple of
Athene Areia on the Areopagus may not have existed when the hill first
became famed for its legal judgments. The Palladium and the Delphinium
were both temple courts, and during the Dark Ages (900-750 B.C.) the
right of sanctuary may have given to these places their first connexion
with homicide-investigation. This is, however, an accidental matter. The
real cause of the birth of the Attic murder courts was the concurrence of
the doctrine of homicide-pollution with the political synoekism of States
in the eighth and seventh centuries B.C. Some Attic courts may have
functioned in an arbitrary manner for local offences in earlier times,
but their historical rôle began, and some of them, like Phreatto, were
born, in the seventh century B.C.
DRACON AND THE EPHETAE
Was it then Dracon who established the Ephetae courts as Solon
established the Heliastic courts? Gilbert[100] finds it difficult to
decide this question. ‘Whether Dracon himself,’ he says, ‘introduced or
merely codified, in accordance with customs already existing, the system
by which murder cases were tried at Athens and which, even measured by
the standard of to-day, is tolerably complete, can as little be decided
with certainty as can the question whether he was the founder of the five
different courts at which in later times the trial was held according to
the nature of the case.’ Yet, a few lines previously[101] Gilbert decides
the latter question in the affirmative. ‘Dracon,’ he says, ‘transferred
the judicial powers which the Areopagus had previously possessed to two
new bodies which he created, the Ephetae and the Prytaneis.’
This question, for many scholars, has turned on the interpretation of a
passage in Pollux,[102] who wrote eight hundred years after the event.
Pollux says of the Ephetae that they were fifty-one in number and that
‘Dracon established them, chosen on grounds of birth. They were the
judges of those accused of bloodshed in the five courts. It was Solon
who established in addition the council of the Areopagus.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account