Polite Conversation in Three DialoguesSwift, Jonathan
General
Polite Conversation in Three Dialogues
Swift, Jonathan
Conversation -- Humor -- Early works to 1800; Satire, English -- Early works to 1800
The “Conversation” appeared very late in Swift’s life, and he himself
derived no pecuniary benefit from it. He had, with that almost careless
generosity which distinguished him side by side with an odd kind
of parsimony, given the manuscript to a not particularly reputable
_protégée_ of his, Mrs. Barber, about 1736, and its first edition—a copy
of which, presented to me by my friend Mr. Austin Dobson no small number
of years ago, is here reproduced—bears date 1738, and was published
in London by Motte and Bathurst. The composition, however, dates, as
is known to a practical certainty, many years earlier. It is beyond
any reasonable doubt identical with the “Essay on Conversation” which
Swift noted as written or planned in 1708-10. The _nom de guerre_ on
the title-page and to the introduction is Simon Wagstaff, one of the
literary family of Staffs fathered by Swift and Steele in “Tatler” times.
The manners are evidently those of Queen Anne’s day, and the whole
chronology of the introduction (which, it will be seen, has all Swift’s
mock carefulness and exactitude) is adjusted to the first decade of the
eighteenth century. A hundred years later Scott (whose own evident relish
for the “Conversation” struggled somewhat with a desire to apologise
for its coarseness to the decencies even of his own day), hazarded the
opinion that the abundance of proverbial expressions must be set down to
the Dean’s own fancy, not to actual truth of reporting. It is always with
great diffidence that I venture to differ with Sir Walter; but I think
he was wrong here. One piece of indirect evidence—the extreme energy
with which Chesterfield, at no very distant date from the publication,
but after a lapse of fully a generation from the probable composition
of the dialogues, inveighs against this very practice—would seem to be
sufficient to establish its authenticity. For polite society, where its
principles are not, as they generally are, pretty constant, is never
so bitter as against those practices which were the mode and are now
_démodés_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account