Popular lectures on scientific subjects : $b Second series, with an autobiography of the authorHelmholtz, Hermann von
Science
Popular lectures on scientific subjects : $b Second series, with an autobiography of the author
Helmholtz, Hermann von
Science; Universities and colleges -- Germany
Any of my fellow-students who wished to make experiments had to do
so at the cost of his pocket-money. One thing we learned thereby,
which the younger generation does not, perhaps, learn so well in the
laboratories--that is, to consider in all directions the ways and
means of attaining the end, and to exhaust all possibilities, in the
consideration, until a practicable path was found. We had, it is true,
an almost uncultivated field before us, in which almost every stroke of
the spade might produce remunerative results.
It was one man more especially who aroused our enthusiasm for work in
the right direction--that is, Johannes Müller, the physiologist. In his
theoretical views he favoured the vitalistic hypothesis, but in the
most essential points he was a natural philosopher, firm and immovable;
for him, all theories were but hypotheses, which had to be tested by
facts, and about which facts could alone decide. Even the views upon
those points which most easily crystallise into dogmas, on the mode of
activity of the vital force and the activity of the conscious soul, he
tried continually to define more precisely, to prove or to refute by
means of facts.
And, although the art of anatomical investigation was most familiar to
him, and he therefore recurred most willingly to this, yet he worked
himself into the chemical and physical methods which were more foreign
to him. He furnished the proof that fibrine is dissolved in blood; he
experimented on the propagation of sound in such mechanisms as are
found in the drum of the ear; he treated the action of the eye as an
optician. His most important performance for the physiology of the
nervous system, as well as for the theory of cognition, was the actual
definite establishment of the doctrine of the specific energies of
the nerves. In reference to the separation of the nerves of motor and
sensible energy, he showed how to make the experimental proof of Bell’s
law of the roots of the spinal cord so as to be free from errors; and
in regard to the sensible energies he not only established the general
law, but carried out a great number of separate investigations, to
eliminate objections, and to refute false indications and evasions.
That which hitherto had been imagined from the data of everyday
experience, and which had been sought to be expressed in a vague
manner, in which the true was mixed up with the false; or which had
just been established for individual branches, such as by Dr. Young for
the theory of colours, or by Sir Charles Bell for the motor nerves,
that emerged from Müller’s hands in a state of classical perfection--a
scientific achievement whose value I am inclined to consider as equal
to that of the discovery of the law of gravitation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account