Popular lectures on scientific subjects : $b Second series, with an autobiography of the authorHelmholtz, Hermann von
Science
Popular lectures on scientific subjects : $b Second series, with an autobiography of the author
Helmholtz, Hermann von
Science; Universities and colleges -- Germany
For example, the proposition that if the shortest line drawn between
two points is called a _straight_ line, there can be only one such
straight line. Again, it is an axiom that through any three points
in space, not lying in a straight line, a plane may be drawn, i.e.
a surface which will wholly include every straight line joining any
two of its points. Another axiom, about which there has been much
discussion, affirms that through a point lying without a straight
line only one straight line can be drawn parallel to the first; two
straight lines that lie in the same plane and never meet, however far
they may be produced, being called parallel. There are also axioms that
determine the number of dimensions of space and its surfaces, lines and
points, showing how they are continuous; as in the propositions, that
a solid is bounded by a surface, a surface by a line and a line by a
point, that the point is indivisible, that by the movement of a point
a line is described, by that of a line a line or a surface, by that of
a surface a surface or a solid, but by the movement of a solid a solid
and nothing else is described.
Now what is the origin of such propositions, unquestionably true yet
incapable of proof in a science where everything else is reasoned
conclusion? Are they inherited from the divine source of our reason as
the idealistic philosophers think, or is it only that the ingenuity of
mathematicians has hitherto not been penetrating enough to find the
proof? Every new votary, coming with fresh zeal to geometry, naturally
strives to succeed where all before him have failed. And it is quite
right that each should make the trial afresh; for, as the question has
hitherto stood, it is only by the fruitlessness of one’s own efforts
that one can be convinced of the impossibility of finding a proof.
Meanwhile solitary inquirers are always from time to time appearing who
become so deeply entangled in complicated trains of reasoning that they
can no longer discover their mistakes and believe they have solved the
problem. The axiom of parallels especially has called forth a great
number of seeming demonstrations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account